Uveitis Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment

Uveitis Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment


Uveitis refers to inflammation of the uveal coat of the eye and is a prevalent cause of visual impairment in most countries. The uvea consists of 3 tissues that are continuous with each other: the iris anteriorly, the choroid posteriorly, and the ciliary body between the iris and choroid. In addition to providing most of the blood supply of the intraocular structures, the uveal coat acts as a conduit for immune cells, particularly lymphocytes, to enter the eye. Consequently, it is directly involved in many intraocular inflammatory processes. The International Uveitis Study Group classifies uveitis in terms of eye(s) involved (ie, unilateral or bilateral), course (ie, acute [lasting less than 12 weeks] or chronic [lasting more than 12 weeks]), and anatomical location in the eye (Table 1).1 Anterior uveitis includes iritis, anterior cyclitis, and iridocyclitis involving the iris and/or pars plicata (anterior ciliary body). Intermediate uveitis includes pars planitis, posterior cyclitis, hyalitis, and basal retinochoroiditis, referring to inflammation of the pars plana (posterior ciliary body) and/or adjacent peripheral retina. Posterior uveitis includes focal, multifocal, or diffuse choroiditis; retinitis; retinochoroiditis; and chorioretinitis; the latter 2 terms indicate which tissue appears primarily involved. Panuveitis refers to inflammation that involves both the anterior and posterior segments. Uveitis is further classified on the presence or absence of granulomatous inflammation, marked by “mutton fat” keratic precipitates (large, greasy-appearing collections of inflammatory cells on the corneal endothelium), iris nodules, and/or choroidal granulomas (Figure 1). Uveitis frequently occurs in the context of systemic inflammatory disease, which may cause additional morbidity. Conversely, uveitis often represents the first manifestation of a systemic disease (Figure 2).2,3 Sixty percent of uveitis is limited to the eyes; in the other 40% of patients, an underlying systemic disease, often of autoimmune origin, can be identified.4 Consequently, management of patients

O’Neil M. Biscette, MD, MSCmpE, is a research fellow at the Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute of the Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons in New York. Howard F. Fine, MD, is a fellow in vitreoretinal surgery at the Harkness Institute. Thomas E. Flynn, MD, is associate professor of ophthalmology at the Harkness Institute. Dr. Biscette can be contacted via e-mail at None of the authors have any financial interest in any products mentioned in this article.

with uveitis often requires a multidisciplinary approach. The annual incidence of uveitis is between 17 and 52 per 100,000 people, and the prevalence is 38 to 714 cases per 100,000.5-7 It has been estimated that uveitis accounts for about 10% of the visual handicaps in the western world8 and up to 15% of all cases of total blindness in the United States.9 Legal blindness develops in at least 1 eye in 22% of all uveitis patients and in about 23% of all who require intraocular surgery.9 Visual acuity (VA) loss to worse than 6/18 in at least 1 eye occurs in 35% of patients with uveitis, mainly as a result of persistent macular edema.9 The ocular complications of uveitis are usually directly responsible for the decrease in VA. In 1 study, cystoid macular edema (CME) was the most frequent cause of both irreversible blindness and decrease in VA.10 Other ocular complications of uveitis include cataract, glaucoma, retinal vascular abnormalities, macular lesions,

Figure 1. Keratic precipitates and a small layered hypopyon.

retinal detachment, corneal opacities, optic-nerve atrophy, and phthisis. Uveitis may occur at any age, but it most commonly affects individuals between 20 and 59 years of age.5,8-11 Uveitis in children younger than 16 years old accounts for only 5% to 10% of cases.12 Childhood uveitis is associated with unique diagnostic and management issues, tendency for chronic disease, and high complication rates.13 In 1 study, the most frequent complication was cataract, followed by glaucoma, with 2% suffering bilateral legal blindness and 17% with unilateral legal blindness.14 In this article, we will review the diagnosis of, comanagement of, and current therapy for uveitis. This discussion is limited mainly to noninfectious forms of the disease.

Figure 2. Neuroretinitis in a patient infected with Bartonellae henselae acquired from a kitten.

As in all medical conditions, the key to diagnosis in uveitis is an accurate and relevant history and physical examination. Depending upon the presentation, specific information can be elicited from the history and physical examination of the eye and body.However, it is often difficult to arrive at a diagnosis on the basis of history and physical alone. Consequently, additional laboratory and other diagnostic investigation often become necessary. The proper diagnosis of the underlying disease process allows the clinician to determine not only the etiology of the inflammation, but also serves to guide the specific treatment. Although great improvements have been made in the diagnostic methods over the past few years, there is no standardized battery of tests that is ordered for all patients with uveitis. Instead, testing should be tailored to individual patients based on their presentation and the differential diagnosis. When the history and physical exam do not clearly indicate a cause, most uveitis specialists recommend a subset of core tests including complete blood count (CBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), lysozyme, syphilis serologic profile, HLA markers, and chest radiographs. Baseline CBC is usually indicated in patients with uveitis to aid in the diagnosis of common infectious causes of uveitis, as well as rare malignant causes of uveitis such as the acute leukemias,14 to establish a baseline for monitoring the effects of treatments (discussed below). ESR can be useful when giant-cell arteritis is suspected as a potential cause of uveitis, as well as in other inflammatory conditions such as systemic lupus erythematosis and rheumatoid arthritis. ACE and lysozyme are useful in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, and syphilis serologic profile is also useful if sexual history indicates risk factors. Specific HLA markers can be useful based on family history, signs, and symptoms, as well as geographic location (see below). Depending on risk factors, tests for Lyme disease, Herpes viruses, Bartonella (Figure 2), and skin tests for tuberculosis may be ordered. Some of the most useful diagnostic methods employed in the diagnosis of inflammatory eye diseases will be discussed.
When Should Additional Diagnostic Testing Be Done?
Diagnostic testing in a patient with a single episode of mild unilateral acute anterior uveitis without any accompanying systemic symptoms and signs that behaves in a benign fashion is often avoided. Further investigation should be undertaken if the patient has (1) intermediate, posterior, diffuse, or bilateral inflammation; (2) recurrent, moderate, or severe inflammation, with or without granulomatous features; or (3) systemic symptoms or signs suggesting an underlying medical diagnosis.15
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)

Both ESR and C-reactive protein (CRP) are acutephase reactants that show good correlation with each other but are very nonspecific in the diagnosis of uveitis.
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE)

Angiotensin converting enzyme, a relatively nonspecific enzyme, is produced by the capillary endothelial cells in lung and liver tissues and by secretory monocytes. In the setting of uveitis, ACE has increased specificity for granulomatous diseases such as sarcoidosis, leprosy, and histoplasmosis. Levels are elevated in 35% to 80% of patients with sarcoidosis.16 The sensitivity for ACE predicting sarcoidosis in one study was 59%.17
Antinuclear Antibodies (ANA)

Antinuclear antibody elevation is very nonspecific particularly in the elderly. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis ( JIA) is probably the uveitis condition for which ANA testing is most appropriate. The presence of ANA was shown to nearly triple the risk of development of JIA-associated uveitis, which can often be asymptomatic, in children with pauciarticular JIA, who are young, ANA-positive females with fewer than 5 involved joints.18
Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies (ANCA)
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) testing is most useful in scleritis or peripheral ulcerative keratitis with uveitis. A positive cytoplasmic ANCA (c-ANCA) is specific for Wegener granulomatosis, which can be a lifethreatening condition. However, both perinuclear ANCA (p-ANCA) and c-ANCA elevations can also occur in inflammatory bowel disease, HIV infection, and in 10% to 20% of patients with chronic idiopathic uveitis.19
Lysozyme, a hydrolytic enzyme and bacteriolytic glycosidase, has been found in all 3 human neutrophil granules (azurophil, specific, and gelatinase types).20 Serum lysozyme has been shown to be elevated in a number of conditions, including tuberculosis and sarcoidosis, as well as leukemia. Tomita and colleagues17 found serum lysozyme to have a sensitivity of 79.1% for the prediction of sarcoidosis when serum ACE is also elevated and a sensitivity of 72.1% when serum ACE is normal. In that same study, the sensitivity of high-serum ACE for predicting sarcoidosis was 59.0%.
In cases where noninvasive methods fail to clearly elucidate the diagnosis or in situations where specific information regarding tumor genetic makeup or microbiologic identification is required, tissue biopsy can serve as an excellent investigative tool. It can rule out masquerade syndromes such as intraocular lymphoma. Directed biopsy of disSeased tissue such as conjunctival granulomas in sarcoidosis can be successful in elucidating the cause of uveitis in selected circumstances. Mycobacterium leprae has been detected in iris biopsies.21 Sampling of the vitreous, which can be accomplished by needle aspiration or through vitrectomy, combined with other relevant noninvasive diagnostic testing, can significantly increase the chances of identifying the etiology of the disease process through cytopathologic, microbiologic, and molecular analysis of the sample.22 Obtaining a vitreous sample through pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) may have both diagnostic and therapeutic uses.23

The identification of microorganisms can play a key role in determining the cause of uveitis especially when infection is suspected. Methods of identification include culture and sensitivity, identification of organisms on darkfield microscopy, direct detection of antigens in clinical specimens, demonstration of rising immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies in body fluids, and the detection of specific nucleic acid sequences either by amplification or probes. Depending on the risk factors particular attention should be paid to syphilis, herpes viruses, tuberculosis, and Lyme disease.
Syphilis Testing
Diagnosis of infection with Treponema pallidum, the causative agent in syphilis, is based upon clinical presentation and supported by serologic testing. Direct microscopic identification of T pallidum is possible using techniques such as darkfield microscopy, silver staining, and immunofluorescence staining. Serologic diagnosis is normally based upon the results of both nontreponemal tests such as the Veneral Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) or rapid plasma regain (RPR) and treponemal tests such as the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA-ABS) or microhemagglutination assay-treponemal pallidum (MHA-TP). The nontreponemal tests derive their name from the fact that the detected antibodies are directed against mammalian membrane phospholipids such as cardiolipin. These anticardiolipin antibodies may not be detectable in as many as 30% of treated and untreated people during the late latent or tertiary stages of infection. 24,25 These antibodies may be seen in patients with diseases unrelated to syphilis (eg, collagen vascular disease). Therefore it is necessary to use specific treponemal antibody assays in all cases of suspected disease with a negative RPR or VDRL test. Positive nontreponemal tests indicate active disease and exposure to the bacteria and are best used to diagnose a primary infection, monitor disease activity, or monitor response to therapy based on titer. Both the VDRL and RPR test results return to normal with effective therapy. The fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test (FTA-ABS) or the more specific MHA-TP test is more reliable to prove past infection and may remain positive for life. A 5% to 17% rate of transient or persistent seroreversion has been demonstrated in some studies.26 Patients with uveitis and positive serologic results should undergo spinal fluid examination to rule out asymptomatic neurosyphilis.Traditionally, the VDRL has been used to detect neurosyphilis; however, the serum VDRL may be low or negative, while serum FTA-ABS and CSF serologic tests are positive. In latent syphilis, VDRL and FTA-ABS results are positive, while CSF results are negative.27 Enzyme immunoassay and polymerase chain reaction are being used with increasing frequency in the diagnosis of syphilis because of the high sensitivity and specificity in the former and when test samples are minute in the latter.28-30
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a powerful molecular technique for evaluating very small amounts of DNA and RNA. It is a simple, rapid, sensitive, and specific tool for the diagnosis of infection, autoimmunity, and masquerade syndromes in the eye. PCR can be helpful as an adjunct to evaluate biopsy specimens in the diagnosis of cases that have failed to be identified by conventional methods.31
HLA Associations
All animals with leukocytes express a family of cell surface glycoproteins called major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins. In humans the MHC proteins are called human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules. HLA genes are located on the short arm of chromosome 6. Some uveitis syndromes are associated with the possession of certain HLA types (Table 2).32 Despite the fact that numerous studies have revealed an association between various HLA antigens and uveitis syndromes, the mechanism underlying the development of these syndromes remains unknown.With further investigation we may be able to characterize genetic susceptibilities for individual uveitis syndromes and, from this, gain insights into the molecular mechanisms of their pathogenesis.

Other Laboratory Diagnostic Tests

There are numerous other diagnostic laboratory tests that can in specific situations be useful in elucidating the cause of uveitis. Examples include sacroiliac joint radiographs in patients with the HLA B-27 gene, endoscopy of the GI tract when inflammatory bowel disease is suspected, and lumbar puncture and analysis of cerebrospinal fluid when associated neurologic disease is present.
Ocular Imaging Techniques

Imaging techniques such as chest radiograph and computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest for sarcoidosis or tuberculosis are well established. CT scan of the orbits or B-scan ultrasonography can assist in the diagnosis of posterior scleritis, orbital myositis, and orbital inflammatory disease. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain may

Figure 3. Cytomegalovirus retinitis. Note the full thickness retinal necrosis with advancing granular border and retinal hemorrhage. Fundus photography can be important in tracking disease progression.

reveal demyelination, indicating inflammatory activity that can be caused by various entities such as multiple sclerosis and Lyme disease, both of which can be associated with pars planitis, suggest orbital malignancy or neurosarcoidosis when used in conjunction with ocular imaging techniques. These provide useful information in the diagnosis and management of uveitis, as well as the diagnosis and management of the disease process itself. In this paper, we will concentrate on ocular imaging techniques.
▪ Color fundus photography. Color fundus photography is useful in documenting the presence of posterior-segment pathology. Color photography can often highlight subtle clinical findings, and it is especially useful for establishing a baseline and detecting disease progression over time (Figure 3).
▪ Fluorescein angiography. Fluorescein angiography (FA) is useful in evaluating changes such as breakdown in the blood-retinal barrier, which can lead to CME and papillitis. FA is also useful in detecting vascular occlusion from vasculitis, which can be the result of the numerous causes of posterior uveitis and choroiditis,33-35 as well as complications such as retinal or choroidal neovascularization (CNV).
▪ Indocyanine green angiography. Indocyanine green (ICG) angiography is used mainly as an adjunct to FA to help evaluate the choroidal vasculature. The most useful information is obtained in the later phases of the ICG study.36 Herbort and colleagues37 developed in 1997 a standardized protocol for administration and interpretation of posterior uveitis using ICG. Several conditions, such as birdshot retinochoroiditis, are much more prominent with ICG angiography.
▪ Autofluorescence.Autofluorescence (AF) imaging highlights the presence of lipofuscin in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Since many posterior uveitic conditions, particularly the white spot syndromes, affect the outer retina-RPE-choriocapillaries complex, AF can be a particu-

Figure 4. Multiple chorioretinal spots from infection with West Nile Virus are subtle on color photography but prominent on autofluorescence imaging.

larly useful noninvasive diagnostic tool (Figure 4). For instance, the numerous dots and spots of MEWDS are much easier to appreciate with fundus AF.38
▪ B-scan ultrasonography. B-scan ultrasonography has been most useful in the evaluation of intraocular disorders associated with opacified media. Opacified media can be caused by intraocular inflammation and its complications, as well as other conditions, including but not limited to corneal opacification, anterior chamber hyphema or hypopyon, posterior synechiae with miosis, cataract, vitreous hemorrhage, and retinal detachment. Ultrasound can also be used to evaluate inflammatory infiltration of the choroid, as occurs in chronic uveitis including Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) syndrome, sympathetic ophthalmia, and combined scleral and choroidal thickening from scleritis.39 In these situations, ultrasound becomes useful in evaluating patients prior to instituting therapy or planning surgery. In the presence of clear media, high-frequency ultrasound or ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) can be of additional use, particularly for examination of the region of the ciliary body and pars plana, which are often involved in patients with intermediate uveitis and can be difficult to visualize clinically (Figure 5).40 UBM may also identify occult foreign bodies in cases of chronic uveitis occurring after trauma.
▪ Optical coherence tomography. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is currently one of the most important imaging techniques used in the study of uveitis. It enables imaging of the optic nerve head, nerve fiber layer, retina, choroid, and the vitreoretinal interface in a noncontact and noninvasive manner. It can be repeated as often as necessary since there are no serious side effects in OCT testing. OCT can be used to quantify macular thickening and thus is an excellent way of diagnosing CME and monitoring the effectiveness of treatment (Figure 6).41,42 OCT can detect vitreoretinal interface disorders such as epiretinal membranes, macular holes, and vitreomacular traction, which can assist in management.43-45 OCT is also valuable in the study of the different types of retinal detachment and the role, location, and density of an associated exudate. The most important limitation of OCT is its reliance on relatively clear media for useful images. A second factor limiting OCT’s utility is the need for patient cooperation with fixation and control of eye movements. These limitations may prove difficult for photophobic subjects.

Figure 5. Inflammatory ciliary body effusion and detachment detected on ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) in a patient with sarcoidosis with hypotony. S=sclera, K=cornea, CB=ciliary body, I=iris.

The current treatment of uveitis consists of immunomodulatory medications aimed at first controlling acute inflammation and then maintaining long-term remission. Despite considerable progress, we continue to have significant challenges in the safe and effective management of uveitis. Additionally, uveitis frequently occurs in the context of systemic inflammatory disease, which may cause additional morbidity.2,3 Therefore, management of uveitis requires close collaboration between the ophthalmologist and primary care provider — and possibly uveitis specialist and/or rheumatologist. Management of a patient with uveitis involves the diagnosis of the particular uveitis subtype, evaluation of the level of intraocular inflammation, and the institution of appropriate therapy. For mild anterior uveitis, local therapy is typically appropriate, including topical corticosteroids and cycloplegia, periocular corticosteroid injections, and recently, long-term intraocular corticosteroid implants. For more severe cases of uveitis, especially posterior uveitis or panuveitis, systemic therapy is often warranted. Corticosteroids represent the mainstay of medical therapy of patients with uveitis due to their effectiveness at controlling inflammation in both the short and long terms. There are myriad side effects of corticosteroids, however, both ocular and systemic. Ocular sequelae include acceleration of cataract formation and glaucoma. Systemic side effects include weight gain, gastric ulceration, osteoporosis, fluid retention, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and mental status changes, to name a few.

Figure 6. Optical coherence tomogram through fovea in patient with cystoid macular edema.

Use of medications requires the physician to follow the response to treatment and monitor the patient for drugrelated side effects, both in the eyes and systemically. Surgery may be planned to augment medical treatment or visually rehabilitate the eyes. However, steroid-sparing therapy or additional immunosuppressive therapy often must be prescribed because of the severity and duration of disease and the inevitable presence of corticosteroid side effects. Classes of noncorticosteroid immunosuppressive agents include antimetabolites, cyclosporines, alkylating agents, T-cell inhibitors, biologic agents, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). A panel of 12 US physicians with expertise in ophthalmology, rheumatology, pediatrics, and the care of inflammatory diseases recently reviewed published data and developed recommendations regarding the role of systemic immunosuppressive agents in the management of inflammatory eye diseases. The report is a valuable resource46 to assist in deciding to employ these medications.

Corticosteroids have been used effectively in the treatment of inflammatory disease of a noninfectious cause. Because of their immediate efficacy, topical corticosteroids are useful in the management of anterior uveitis, whereas periocular and intravitreal steroid injections can be used for intermediate and posterior uveitis and CME. Some patients may require systemic corticosteroids that can be administered orally or intravenously. Patients may have adverse effects from locally administered corticosteroids, making the use of systemic corticosteroids or other agents necessary.When systemic corticosteroids are insufficient to control the disease because of adverse corticosteroid side effects or are required for long-term use (more than 3 months) and at a high dose (more than 10 mg/day of prednisone), a corticosteroid-sparing agent should be considered.47
Topical Corticosteroids

Topical corticosteroid eye drops in combination with cycloplegic agents are the first line of treatment for anterior uveitis. Depending on the severity of the inflammatory reaction, these agents are used as frequently as every halfhour initially, and anterior uveitis is often readily controlled without the need for additional immunosurpression. In chronic cases — for example, patients with JIA-associated uveitis — topical corticosteroids cause cataract and elevate intraocular pressure (IOP), requiring additional immunosuppression to control intraocular inflammation after the initiation of therapy.48
Periocular Corticosteroids

Sometimes an increase in disease activity warrants an increase in medication beyond the use of topical medication. Periocular steroids represent a good alternative to systemic medications and have been used in the treatment of CME and posterior uveitis.49-52 The traditional medicines and routes of administration are triamcinolone acetonide (Kenalog, Bristol-Myers Squibb) 40 mg/mL52 in the posterior subtenon space in the superotemporal quadrant and methylprednisolone acetate 40 mg/mL53 in the orbital floor.54-56 It has been suggested that triamcinolone acetonide administered in the posterior subtenon space is more efficacious.57 Known complications of the procedure include increase in IOP in steroid-responsive patients, inadvertent intraocular penetration with the needle, scleral melting when used in some scleritis patients, worsening of undiagnosed intraocular infections (eg, toxoplasma), and ptosis when triamcinolone acetonide is given in the posterior subtenon space.58
Intravitreal Corticosteroids

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injections have been gaining popularity since their first use in humans in the late 1990s. The use of IVTA is currently referred to as “off-label” because the medication has not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for intraocular administration. Despite the widespread use of triamcinolone acetonide in and around the eye for decades, the manufacturer of the drug, at the urging of the FDA, mailed a “Dear Healthcare Provider” letter to ophthalmologists in November 2006, reminding them that Kenalog has not been approved for intraocular administration.59 It is probably too early to determine the complete impact of this letter; however, the Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance Company’s (OMIC) legal/risk-management department conducted its own analysis of the impact of the letter, consulting with attorneys and FDA officials, and concluded, “It is our opinion that it remains legal for ophthalmologists to administer Kenalog (triamcinolone acetonide) by the routes mentioned in the letter, despite the manufacturer’s warning, as part of ‘the practice of medicine.’”57 IVTA injections have been used to treat various ocular diseases such as uveitis, age related macular degeneration (AMD), and CME from various causes.54-56,60-63 Intravitreal administration of small amounts of corticosteroids provides high intraocular levels with limited systemic side effects.64 The use of IVTA injections in noninfectious uveitis is limited because of its temporary effect, especially on chronic uveitis, which requires sustained therapeutic levels of corticosteroids.65 However, IVTA injections can become useful as additional medication in acute exacerbations or as initial therapy to quickly control inflammation or treat macular edema. Some of the adverse effects of IVTA include endophthalmitis,66,67 elevated IOP,68-71 and cataract.72 The National Eye Institute (NEI) is currently conducting 3 randomized clinical trials on the use of IVTA in various macular diseases.73
Systemic Corticosteroids
In a study on prognosticators for visual outcomes in sarcoid uveitis, Dana and colleagues82 demonstrated that, in patients treated with topical corticosteroids, transseptal corticosteroids, systemic corticosteroids, topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs), and systemic NSAIDs, systemic corticosteroid treatment was associated with better VA outcomes, suggesting that systemic therapy has an important role to play in the management of patients with chronic uveitis.74 The most common type of oral corticosteroid used is prednisone at a typical initial dose of 1 mg/kg/day for high-dose administration in the adult patient, which is then gradually tapered. If high-dose immediate-acting steroid therapy is needed in order to save vision, methylprednisolone sodium succinate (Solu-Medrol, Pfizer) can be given intravenously. The usual regimen consists of 1-g pulses per day given on 3 consecutive days and is followed by oral corticosteroid therapy.75 Long-term monthly pulses have been employed for serious autoimmune diseases such as lupus nephritis and may prove useful in a very limited group of severely affected uveitis patients. While on corticosteroid therapy, patients should be monitored closely for response to steroid treatment and for adverse effects from the medication. If the inflammatory reaction is not completely quiet after 4 weeks of treatment with high-dose steroid therapy, the physician should consider adding additional local or systemic immunosuppressive therapy. After a satisfactory suppression of inflammation, systemic corticosteroids should be tapered and discontinued if possible. If the inflammation recurs during the tapering schedule, resume a higher dosage until the disease is again quiet and taper back to just above the threshold at which the disease reactivated. If chronic suppression of disease requires more than 5 to 10 mg/day of prednisone or its equivalent, a steroid-sparing immunosuppressive drug should be instituted.47 Long-term steroid therapy, whether administered systemically or locally, can result in considerable adverse effects on the eye, including cataract formation and increased IOP.76-78 Patients can also have delayed wound healing, secondary infection, and reactivation of latent herpes simplex infections.79-82 A skin test for prior exposure to tuberculosis should be considered before starting systemic steroid or any other immunosuppressive medication. Additional systemic side effects include osteoporosis, endocrinologic abnormalities including hyperglycemia, cardiovascular abnormalities, aseptic necrosis of bone, psychosis, pancreatitis and myopathy.83-91 Therefore, patients should be counseled and monitored continuously when on chronic steroid therapy. Alternatives to steroid therapy should be considered early and discussed fully with patients when a course of treatment is begun.
Immunosuppressive Drugs

In patients with diseases poorly responsive to corticosteroids, chronic or relapsing disease requiring a dose of prednisone of more than 10 mg/day, or intolerable corticosteroid side effects, corticosteroid therapy is often replaced or supplemented with immunosuppressive therapy. There are also cases in which early and aggressive immunosuppressive drug therapy can play a key role in preventing irreversible vision loss.92 Current immunosuppressive medication classes, along with their dosages, efficacy, side-effect profiles and the conditions in which they have been used, are discussed below.

Methotrexate is a folic acid analog that inhibits dihydrofolate reductase, an action that inhibits the production of thymidylate, which is essential for DNA replication. Therefore, methotrexate inhibits rapidly dividing cells, such as leukocytes, producing an anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive effect.93 Methotrexate can be given orally, subcutaneously, intramuscularly, or intravenously. It is typically administered at a dose ranging from 7.5 to 25 mg once per week in a single or divided dose. Folic acid at 1 to 5 mg/day or folinic acid should be given concurrently to maintain adequate folate stores and to reduce toxicity. The full effect from methotrexate therapy takes 6 to 8 weeks to occur.94 Methotrexate has been used to treat a variety of ocular inflammatory conditions in both children and adults, including vasculitis, panuveitis, intermediate uveitis, vitritis, scleritis, orbital pseudotumor, myositis, and sarcoid-associated panuveitis. In general, preserved or improved VA, decreased corticosteroid use, and decreased ocular inflammation were reported.95-98 Common side effects of methotrexate are fatigue, nausea, stomach upset, stomatitis, and anorexia and are seen in 10% to 25% of patients.48 The more serious potential side effects include hepatotoxicity (abnormal liver function tests occur in about 15% of patients, whereas only 0.3% of patients develop hepatic cirrhosis), bone marrow suppression (<5%), and interstitial pneumonias (rare and idiosyncratic).99-101 Methotrexate is a teratogen and contraindicated in pregnancy; contraception should be discussed before prescribing this (or any other) immunosuppressive medication. Baseline labs that should be ordered before methotrexate therapy is initiated include CBC, serum chemistry panel, serum creatinine, liver function tests, hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C antigen, and pregnancy test. CBC, serum creatinine, and liver function tests should be repeated every 1 to 2 months. The concurrent use of methotrexate with alcohol is discouraged, and use with statins and other hepatoxic drugs requires close attention. If liver enzymes double on 2 separate occasions, the methotrexate dose should be reduced. If liver enzymes remain elevated after dose reduction, methotrexate should be discontinued.48
Azathioprine is a purine nucleoside analog that interferes with purine synthesis and thus with DNA and RNA replication and transcription. Azathioprine decreases circulating lymphocytes, suppresses lymphocyte proliferation, and inhibits antibody production.102-104 Azathioprine has been shown to be effective in the treatment of Behçet disease as solo therapy105 or in combination with prednisone or cyclosporin in treating serpiginous choroiditis, multifocal choroiditis and panuveitis, and tubulointerstitial nephritis.106-108 Azathioprine is administered orally at a dose of 1 to 3 mg/kg/day. Dosing is adjusted according to response. Adverse effects of azathioprine include gastrointestinal (GI) upset, hepatotoxicity, and bone marrow suppression.109-111 Patients should be monitored for bone marrow suppression with complete blood and platelet counts every 4 to 6 weeks, as well as with liver function tests. If mild abnormalities are noted, the dose should be decreased by about 30% to 50%; if major abnormalities are noted, the medication should be temporarily halted and the patient followed closely (every 2 weeks) to verify recovery. The medication then may be restarted at lower dosages.112
Mycophenolate mofetil
Mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept, Roche) inhibits the enzyme inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase involved in guanosine nucleotide synthesis and thus interferes with nucleic acid synthesis. It has relatively selective inhibition of T- and B-cell proliferation without causing as much myelotoxicity.113 When used to treat uveitis, mycophenolate mofetil is usually given orally, 1 to 1.5 g twice daily. It is best absorbed on an empty stomach and is metabolized to its active acid form, mycophenolic acid. It is excreted by the kidneys.Mycophenolate mofetil has been shown to be effective in the treatment of patients with steroid-dependent or steroid-resistant chronic uveitis when used in combination with other therapies, such as oral corticosteroid or cyclosporine A.114-117 Adverse side effects at the higher dosage levels required for the prevention of organ transplant rejection include GI side effects, opportunistic infections, leucopenia, lymphoma, hepatotoxicity, and nonmelanoma skin cancers.118,119 CBC should be monitored every week for 4 weeks, every 2 weeks for 2 months, and then every month thereafter. Liver enzymes should be monitored every 3 months.48

Cyclosporine, an 11-amino acid cyclic peptide, is a natural product of fungi that binds cyclophilin and then calcineurin, preferentially affecting immunocompetent T-lymphocytes, as well as their ability to produce lymphokines, such as interleukin-2.120 In the treatment of uveitis, an initial dose is 2 to 5 mg/kg/day divided into 2 doses, which is adjusted according to response and side effects. By comparison, organ-transplant doses usually begin at 10 mg/kg/day. Cyclosporine has been reported to be effective either as monotherapy or in combination with corticosteroids or antimetabolites. The effect of the combination therapy was shown to be superior to either individual therapy.121-124 Adverse effects include renal toxicity, especially with doses higher than 10 mg/kg/day or very prolonged duration of administration. This is often reversible with cessation. Other side effects include hypertension, stomach upset, hypertrichosis, gingival hyperplasia, myalgias, tremor, paresthesia, hypomagnesemia, hyperkalemia, and elevated uric acid levels.125 Serum creatinine and blood pressure should be checked every 2 weeks, then monthly if proving to be stable. Electrolytes and uric acid levels should also be monitored periodically. Cyclosporine levels are sometimes monitored in the blood to assess toxicity or “therapeutic range” based on transplant requirements; the use of these levels in uveitis is not well established.

Tacrolimus (Prograf, Astellas) is a macrolide antibiotic that interacts with and inhibits calcineurin, thus inhibiting both T-lymphocyte signal transduction and interleukein (IL)-2 transcription.126 When used for the treatment of uveitis, tacrolimus is usually administered orally. However, it is also available as an intravenous formulation. The initial oral uveitis dose is 0.05 mg/kg/day, while an initial oral dose of 0.10 to 0.15 mg/kg/day is recommended for adult liver transplant patients. Successful treatment of uveitis with tacrolimus has been reported. Efficacy was also reported in patients that failed cyclosporine treatment.127-130 Common side effects, which are often reversible with reduced dosing, include renal impairment, neurologic symptoms, GI symptoms, and hyperglycemia. Additional reported adverse events include hypomagnesemia, tremor, headache, trouble sleeping, paresthesias, and hypertension.129 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis is a known complication of tacrolimus used in transplant regimens; the infection often abates when the level of immunosuppression is decreased. Baseline and weekly laboratory assessment should include liver enzymes, bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, electrolytes, cholesterol and triglyc-erides, glucose, and CBC. After a stable dose has been established, the frequency may be reduced to monthly. Blood pressure should also be monitored at every visit.
Cyclophosphamide is an alkylating agent derived from mustard gas that inhibits T-cell and B-cell proliferation. The drug has been shown to suppress humoral and cellular immune responses and therefore decreases the numbers of B- and T-cells, decreases antibody production, and suppresses delayed-type hypersensitivity to antigens in rheumatologic patients.131 The oral dose of cyclophosphamide is 1 to 3 mg/kg/day, which can be adjusted depending on response and toxicity. Cyclophosphamide may also be employed intravenously on a monthly dosing schedule. The daily dosage typically is decreased by 25 to 50 mg for toxicity. Foster and colleagues132 reported that cyclophosphamide with corticosteroids is more effective in disease control than corticosteroids alone for cicatrical pemphigoid with eye involvement. Efficacy has also been reported in other uncontrolled case series.133,134 Side effects of cyclophosphamide include bone marrow suppression, which is dose dependent, reversible, and more common in older individuals; and hemorrhagic cystitis, which is uncommon and seen primarily in individuals with bladder stasis or those unable to take adequate fluids. Other toxicities include teratogenicity (cyclophosphamide is contraindicated in pregnancy), ovarian suppression, testicular atrophy, and azospermia. Baseline and weekly laboratory assessment should include a CBC, platelet count, and urinalysis. After stable dosing is established, the frequency of testing should be decreased to at least every 4 weeks. If mild bone marrow suppression is seen, the dosage should be lowered by 25 to 50 mg/day and the laboratory tests repeated in 2 weeks. If more severe bone marrow suppression is seen (eg, leukocytes less than 2500 cells per mL), therapy is interrupted until the counts have recovered, and then therapy is resumed at a lower dose. If hematuria occurs, cyclophosphamide should be discontinued. If hematuria persists after 3 to 4 weeks, a urologist should be consulted.135
Chlorambucil (Leukeran, GlaxoSmithKline) is an alkylating agent that interferes with DNA replication, DNA transcription, and nucleic acid function.136 Chlorambucil is typically given at a dose of 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg/day as a single dose, which is continued for 1 year after disease quiescence.137 Short-term high-dose therapy for 3 to 6 months can also be administered. Efficacy of chlorambucil in the treatment of various subtypes of uveitis has been reported. Most patients required coadministration with corticosteroids initially, with tapering and eventual discontinuation.138-143 Side effects of chlorambucil include reversible myelosuppression, bone marrow aplasia, permanent sterility in men, and amenorrhea in women.144,145 Baseline and weekly CBC should be monitored initially. Once a stable dose has been achieved, the frequency of monitoring may be reduced to monthly.
Intravenous Immunoglobulin

The mechanism of action of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is not well understood. Several small studies have reported on the use of IVIg in the treatment of uveitis with encouraging results.146-148
Biologic agents are drugs created by molecular biologic techniques directed against specific cytokines or cell-surface markers, including their receptors.149
The efficacy of infliximab (Remicade, Centocor), a tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antagonist mousehuman chimeric antibody, has been demonstrated in the treatment of several uveitis subtypes, including but not limited to Behççet disease. Most studies involved patients with severe or treatment-resistant ocular inflammation with encouraging responses to infliximab therapy.150-154 Infliximab is administered intravenously at 1 to 2 month intervals at doses of 3 to 10 mg/kg, with the dose and frequency depending on clinical response. The level of immunosuppression obtained with these agents can be profound. The use of TNF-alpha inhibitors with lupus and demyelinating disease is contraindicated. Pre-existing infections, such as tuberculosis or unsuspected fungal infections, must be rigorously screened — severe reactivation of infections and even fatalities have occurred with this class of medication. The drug is given concomitantly with methotrexate or another immunosuppressive drug to limit development of host antibodies to the agent.

Adalimumab (Humira, Abbott) is a human antibody developed to TNF-alpha that may avoid some of the issues associated with long-term use of chimeric antibodies. The agent is administered every 1 to 2 weeks subcutaneously, with or without an adjunct immunosuppressive agent. The use of adalimumab for serious uveitis in children has been recently reported by our group155 and a second study156 has replicated this finding.

Studies of the use of etanercept (Enbrel, Wyeth), another TNF-alpha antagonist, in the treatment of uveitis have been less encouraging than with infliximab157-159 or adalimumab. A number of patients in various studies pre-sented with uveitis occurring while on etanercept that responded readily to another TNF-alpha inhibitor or other immunosuppressive agent.157

In a small uncontrolled case series, daclizumab (Zenapax, Roche), a monoclonal antibody to the interleukin- 2 receptor (anti-Tac), facilitated the reduction in immunosuppressive therapy for patients with uveitis.160 It has been further postulated as a therapy for resistant multiple sclerosis (MS), which allows effective treatment of MSrelated uveitis resistant to other medications. It is given monthly intravenously at 1 mg/kg with or without adjunctive immunosuppression. Results of therapy are encouraging but effectiveness may be limited by side-effects such as medication allergy.
Interferon (IFN) alpha, an endogenous cytokine, has shown some promise in improving both ocular and extraocular manifestations of Behçet disease.161-163

In order to overcome some of the problems inherent with the traditional delivery methods, attention is increasingly turned to intraocular drug-delivery systems. Additionally, there are cases in which medication alone is simply not sufficient to control or halt the complications of intraocular inflammation. For those patients, PPV has been an effective adjunct to medical therapy in the treatment of intraocular inflammation.
Intraocular Drug Delivery
▪ Implantable devices. Implantable devices consist of biodegradable and nonbiodegradable devices. The biodegradable systems are more suitable for short-term therapy and do not have to be removed from the eye, whereas nonbiodegradable systems are used in the management of chronic diseases. Biodegradable devices can be implanted in the anterior chamber, the peribulbar or intrascleral space, or in the vitreous cavity. A rabbit model of CMV retinitis was effectively treated with a ganciclovir sustained-release scleral plug that was inserted through a 1-mm sclerotomy.164 Okabe and colleagues165 also demonstrated delivery of betamethasone phosphate into the vitreous and choroid at concentrations that suppressed inflammatory reactions for more than 8 weeks. The intravitreal ganciclovir implant (Vitrasert, Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY), a nonbiodegradable drug-delivery device, has been used with success to deliver prolonged levels of ganciclovir intravitreally for the treatment of CMV retinitis in patients with AIDS.166-168 Reports on the long-term follow- up results of the nonbiodegradable fluocinolone acetonide implant (Retisert, B&L) to treat posterior uveitis indicate that the implant seems to be promising in patients with posterior uveitis who do not respond to or are intolerant to conventional treatment.169 Additionally, the fluocinoline implant significantly reduced uveitis recurrences, improved VA, and decreased the need for adjunctive therapy in the studied patient population. The most common side effects included increased IOP and cataract progression.170 These devices are relatively large and require a 4- to 5-mm sclerotomy at the pars plana for implantation. They must also be removed or reimplanted if additional treatment is required, during a second surgery. Complications in the posterior segment, including vitreous hemorrhage, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, endophthalmitis, and CME with epiretinal membrane, can develop after implantation.171
Since the introduction of PPV, there have been numerous reports describing the use of vitrectomy in the management of uveitis and its complications.172-175 The reports provide suggestive evidence that PPV is beneficial in improving visual and disease outcomes in patients with uveitis. Additionally, owing to the technical development of PPV, the indications for PPV in the management of uveitis continue to increase.177,178 In a prospective, interventional, randomized, controlled pilot study, 23 eyes of 23 patients were evaluated for the effect of PPV on CME associated with chronic uveitis. That study showed a significant beneficial effect on visual function in one-third of the patients. A large-scale study to define the role of vitrectomy in uveitis is still pending.
Currently there are many uveitis therapies under clinical investigation. Some of these studies are listed in Table 3,37 which can be viewed online at uveitis-table/. The results of these studies should contribute to our understanding of the efficacy and side-effect profiles of those treatments. Novel treatments under development include oil-in-water-type lipid emulsions for drugs that are poorly water soluble. Difluprednate (DFBA) is a waterinsoluble synthetic glucocorticoid that has been formulated as a 0.05% lipid emulsion.When compared with the DFBA 0.05% ophthalmic suspension, the DFBA lipid emulsion showed a 5.7-fold higher concentration of the active metabolite of DFBA in aqueous humor.179 A phase 3 study to assess the efficacy and safety of 0.05% DFBA ophthalmic emulsion in patients with endogenous anterior uveitis in comparison with 0.1% betamethasone sodium phosphate ophthalmic solution (BP) was completed in November 2003, but the results have not yet been published. The drug is currently under further development. There are several revolutions in medicine today that are bound to make marked improvements in uveitis diagnosis and treatment. Advances in structural and functional imaging are having an impact on the early detection and diagnosis of disease activity. Novel drug-delivery systems hold the promise to provide sustained local therapy while minimizing toxicity. Increased understanding of which genes, microbes, and/or environmental triggers are involved in the pathogenesis of various disease states will afford new diagnostic tests and chip away at the large proportion of uveitis cases that are deemed “idiopathic,” or that are diagnosed by clinical pattern recognition rather than objective laboratory testing. Finally, a better molecular understanding of the pathogenesis of disease will also lead to novel, more specific therapies with less ocular and systemic side effects.

1. Bloch-Michel E, Nussenblatt RB. International Uveitis Study Group recommendations
for the evaluation of intraocular inflammatory disease. Am J
Ophthalmol. 1987;103:234-235.
2. Rosenbaum JT. Uveitis: an internist’s view. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:1173-1176.
3. Rodriguez A, Calonge M, Pedroza-Seres M. Referral patterns of uveitis in a tertiary
eye care center. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:593-599.
4. Forrester JV. Endogenous posterior uveitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1990;74:
5. Darrell RW, Wagener HP, Kurland LT. Epidemiology of uveitis. Arch Ophthalmol.
6. Gritz DC, Wong IG. Incidence and prevalence of uveitis in Northern California:
the Northern California Epidemiology of Uveitis Study. Ophthalmology.
7. Dandona L, Dandona R, John RK, et al. Population based assessment of
uveitis in an urban population in southern India. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;
8. Nussenblatt RB. The natural history of uveitis. Int Ophthalmol. 1990;14:
9. Rothova A, Suttorp-van Schulten MS, Frits Treffers W, et al. Causes and frequency
of blindness in patients with intraocular inflammatory disease. Br J
Ophthalmol. 1996;80:332-336.
10. Rothova A, Buitenhuis HJ, Meenken C, et al. Uveitis and systemic disease. Br J
Ophthalmol. 1992;76:137-141.
11. Saari KM, Paivonsalo-Hietanen T, Vaahtoranta-Lehtonen H, et al. Epidemiology
of endogenous uveitis in south-western Finland. Acta Ophthalmol Scand.
12. Cunningham ET Jr. Uveitis in children. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2000;8:
13. De Boer J, Wulffraat N, Rothova A. Visual loss in uveitis of childhood. Br J
Ophthalmol. 2003;87:879-884.
14. Daneshvar H, Hodge W, Gilberg S. Acute myelogenous leukaemia in an adult
presenting with uveitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:882-883.
15. Wade, NK. Diagnostic testing in patients with ocular inflammation. Int
Ophthalmol Clin. 2000;40:37-54.
16. Jordan DR, Anderson RL, Nerad JA, Scrafford DB. The diagnosis of sarcoidosis.
Can J Ophthalmol 1988;23:203-207.
17. Tomita H, Sato S, Matsuda R. Serum lysozyme levels and clinical features of
sarcoidosis. Lung. 1999;177:161-167.
18. Carvounis PE, Herman DC, Cha S, Burke JP. Incidence and outcomes of uveitis
in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, a synthesis of the literature. Graefes Arch Clin
Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244:281-290.
19. Chan TK, Dick AD, Forrester JV, Herriot R. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies
in chronic idiopathic intraocular inflammatory disease. Ocul Immunol
Inflamm. 1996;4:83-90.
20. Lollike K, Kjeldsen L, Sengelov H, et al. Lysozyme in human neutrophils and
plasma: a parameter of myelopoietic activity. Leukemia. 1995;9:159-164.
21. Sharma S, Dhaliwal R, Cruess AF. Septic cardioembolic choroidopathy. Can J
Ophthalmol. 1997;32:42-45.
22. Lobo A, Lightman S. Vitreous aspiration needle tap in the diagnosis of intraocular
inflammation. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:595-599.
23. Stavrou P, Baltatzis S, Letko E, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy in patients with
intermediate uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2001;9:141-151.
24. Wilhelmus K, Lukehart S. Syphilis. In: Pepose J, Holland G, Wilhelmus K, eds.
Ocular Infection and Immunity. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1996:1437-1466.
25. Tamesis RR, Foster CS. Ocular syphilis. Ophthalmology. 1990;97:1281-1287.
26. Aldave AJ, King JA. Ocular syphilis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2001;12:433-441.
27. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Intraocular inflammation and uveitis. In:
Basic Clinical and Science Course. San Francisco, Calif: American Academy of
Ophthalmology; 2003-2004:183-184.
28. Young H, Moyes A, de Ste Croix I, et al. A new recombinant antigen latex
agglutination test (Syphilis Fast) for the rapid serological diagnosis of syphilis.
Int J STD AIDS. 1998,9:196-200.
29. Young H, Moyes A, Seagar L, et al. Novel recombinant-antigen enzyme
immunoassay for serological diagnosis of syphilis. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:
30. Zoechling N, Schluepen EM, Soyer HP, et al. Molecular detection of Treponema
pallidum in secondary and tertiary syphilis. Br J Dermatol. 1997;136:
31. Chan CC, Shen D, Tuo J. Polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of uveitis.
Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2005;45:41-55.
32. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Intraocular inflammation and uveitis. In:
Basic Clinical and Science Course. San Francisco, Calif: American Academy of
Ophthalmology; 2003-2004:92 tableV-2.
33. Chang TS, Aylward GW, Davis JL, et al. Idiopathic retinal vasculitis, aneurysms,
and neuro-retinitis. Retinal Vasculitis Study. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:
34. De Laey JJ. Fluorescein angiography in posterior uveitis. Int Ophthalmol Clin.
35. Ben Ezra D, Forrester JV. Fundal white dots: the spectrum of similar pathological
process. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79:856-860.
36. Howe L, Stanford M, Graham E, et al. Indocyanine green angiography in
inflammatory eye disease. Eye. 1998;12:761-767.
37. Herbort CP, LeHoang P, Guex-Crosier Y. Schematic interpretation of indocyanine
green angiography in posterior uveitis using a standard angiographic protocol.
Ophthalmology. 1998;105:432-440.
38. Gross NE, Yannuzzi LA, Freund KB, Spaide RF, Amato GP, Sigal R. Multiple
evanescent white dot syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:493-500.
39. Ciardella AP, Borodoker N, Costa DL, et al. Imaging the posterior segment in
uveitis. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2002;15:281-296.
40. Tran VT, LeHoang P, Herbort CP. Value of high-frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy
in uveitis. Eye. 2001;15:23-30.
41. Sourdille P, Santiago P. Optical coherence tomography of macular thickness
after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:256-261.
42. Hee M, Puliafito C, Wong C. Quantitative assessment of macular edema with
optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:1019-1029.
43. Wilkins J, Puliafito C, Hee M, et al. Characterization of epiretinal membranes using
optical coherence tomography (OCT). Ophthalmology. 1996;103:2142-2151.
44. Hee M, Puliafito C, Wong C, et al. Optical coherence tomography of macular
holes. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:748-756.
45. Munuera J, Garcia-Layana A, Maldonado M, et al. Optical coherence tomography
in successful surgery of vitreomacular traction syndrome. Arch
Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1388-1389.
46. Jabs DA, Rosenbaum JT, Foster CS, et al. Guidelines for the use of immunosuppressive
drugs in patients with ocular inflammatory disorders: recommendations
of an expert panel. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:492-513.
47. Kim EC, Foster CS. Immunomodulatory therapy for the treatment of ocular
inflammatory disease: evidence-based medicine recommendations for use. Int
Ophthalmol Clin. 2006,42:141-164.
48. Ben Ezra D, Cohen E. Cataract surgery in children with chronic uveitis.
Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1255-60.
49. Tanner V, Kanski JJ, Frith PA. Posterior sub-tenon triamcinolone injection in the
treatment of uveitis. Eye. 1998;12:679-685.
50. Riordan-Eva P, Lightman S. Orbital floor injections in the treatment of uveitis.
Eye. 1994;8:66-69.
51. Helm CJ, Holland GN. The effects of posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone
acetonide in patients with intermediate uveitis. Am J Opthalmol. 1995;
52. Duguid IGM, Horgan S, Palexas G, Lightman SI. The value of orbital floor
steroids injection in the treatment of uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2005;13:
53. Ferrante P, Ramsey A, Bunce C, Lightman S. Clinical trial to compare efficacy
and side-effects of injection of posterior sub-Tenon triamcinolone versus
orbital floor methylprednisolone in the management of posterior uveitis. Clin
Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;32:563-568.
54. Challa JK, Gillies ME, Penfold PL, Gyory JF, Hunyor AB, Billson FA. Exudative
macular degeneration and intravitreal triamcinolone: 18 month follow up. Aust
NZ J Ophthalmol. 1998;26:277-281.
55. Gillies MC, Simpson JM, Luo W, et al. A randomized clinical trial of a single
dose of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for neovascular age-related macular
degeneration: one-year results. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:667-673.
56. Jonas JB, Degenring RF. Kreissig I, Friedemann T. Akkoyun I. Exudative agerelated
macular degeneration treated by intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide: a
prospective comparative nonrandomized study. Eye. 2005;19:163-170.
57. Menke AM. OMIC Risk Manager. San Francisco, Calif: Ophthalmic Mutual
Insurance Company; 2006.
58. Lafranco Dafflon M, Tran VT, Guex-Crosier Y, Herbort CP. Posterior sub-Tenon’s
steroid injections for the treatment of posterior ocular inflammation: indications,
efficacy and side effects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999;237:
59. Lewis-Hall F. Dear Healthcare Provider. New York, NY: Bristol-Myers Squibb
Company; 2006.
60. Benitez Del Castillo Sanchez JM, Garcia SJ. [Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone
acetonide in noninfectious uveitis]. Arch Soc Esp Oftamo. 2001;76:
61. Kramer M, Ehrlich R, Snir M, et al. Intravitreal injections of triamcinolone acetonide
for severe vitritis in patients with incomplete Behçet’s disease. Am J
Ophthalmol. 2004;138:666-667.
62. Jonas JB, Degenring RF, Kamppeter BA. Kreissig I, Akkoyun I.Duration of the
effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide as treatment for diffuse diabetic
macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:158-160.
63. Massin P, Audren F, Haouchine B, et al. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for
diabetic diffuse macular edema: preliminary results of a prospective controlled
trial.Ophthalmology. 2004;111:218-224.
64. Degenring RF, Jonas JB. Serum levels of triamcinolone acetonide after intravitreal
injection. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:1142-1143.
65. Kwak HW, D’Amico DJ. Evaluation of the retinal toxicity and pharmacokinetics
of dexamethasone after intravitreal injection. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:
66. Jager RD, Aiello LP. Patel SC, Cunningham ET Jr. Risks of intravitreous injection:
a comprehensive review. Retina. 2004;24:676-698.
67. Jonas JB, Kreissig I, Degenring RF. Endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection
of triamcinolone acetonide. Arch Ophthalmoogy. 2003;121:1663-1664.
68. Gillies MC, Simpson JM, Billson FA, et al. Safety of an intravitreal injection of
triamcinolone: results from a randomized clinical trial. Arch Ophthalmol.
69. Wingate RJ, Beaumont PE. Intravitreal triamcinolone and elevatedintraocular
pressure. Aust NZ J Ophthalmol. 1999;27:431-432.
70. Smithen LM, Ober MD, Maranan L, Spaide RF. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide
and intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:740-743.
71. Jonas JB, Degenring RF, Kreissig I, Akkoyun I, Kamppeter BA. Intraocular pressure
elevation after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection.
Ophthalmology. 2005;112:593-598.
72. Jonas JB, Kreissig I, Sofker A, Degenring RF. Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone
for diffuse diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:57-61.
73. [database online]. Washington, DC: National Institutes of
Health; 2007.
74. Dana MR, Merayo-Lloves J, Schaumberg DA, Foster CS. Prognosticators for
visual outcome in sarcoid uveitis. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:1846-1853.
75. Reed JB, Morse LS, Schwab iIR High-dose intravenous pulse methylprednisolone
hemisuccinate in acute Behçet retinitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:
76. Munjal VP, Dhir SP, Jain IS, et al. Topical corticosteroids and cataract. Indian J
Ophthalmol. 1984;32:478-480.
77. Panda A, Sood NN, Agarwal LP. Corticosteroid induced glaucoma and cataract.
Indian J Ophthalmol. 1981;29:377-379.
78. Rubin B, Palestine AG. Complications of corticosteroid and immunosuppressive
drugs. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1989;29:159-171.
79. Salmela K. Comparison of the effects of methylprednisolone and hydrocortisone
on granulation tissue development: an experimental study in rat. Scand J
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;15:87-91.
80. Anstead GM. Steroids, retinoids, and wound healing. Adv Wound Care.
81. Klein NC, Go CH, Cunha BA. Infections associated with steroid use. Infect Dis
Clin North Am. 2001;15:423-432.
82. Ostler HB. Glucorticoid therapy in ocular herpes simplex. I. Limitations. Surv
Ophthalmol. 1978;23:35-43.
83. Adinoff AD, Hollister JR. Steroid-induced fractures and bone loss in patients
with asthma. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:265-268.
84. Gunnarsson R, Arner P, Lundgren G, et al. Steroid diabetes after renal transplantation:
a preliminary report. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1977;42:191-194.
85. Arner P, Gunnarsson R, Blomdahl S, et al. Some characteristics of steroid diabetes:
a study in renal-transplant recipients receiving high-dose corticosteroid
therapy. Diabetes Care. 1983;6:23-25.
86. Gabriel SE, Sunku J, Salvarani C, et al. Adverse outcomes of antiinflammatory
therapy among patients with polymyalgia rheumatica. Arthritis Rheum.
87. Covar RA, Leung DY, McCormick D, et al. Risk factors associated with glucocorticoid-
induced adverse effects in children with severe asthma. J Allergy Clin
Immunol. 2000;106:651-659.
88. Sholter DE, Armstrong PW. Adverse effects of corticosteroids on the cardiovascular
system. Can J Cardiol. 2000;16:505-511.
89. Felson DT, Anderson JJ. Across-study evaluation of association between
steroid dose and bolus steroids and avascular necrosis of bone. Lancet.
90. Patten SB, Neutel CI. Corticosteroid-induced adverse psychiatric effects: incidence,
diagnosis and management. Drug Saf. 2000;22:111-122.
91. Vanelle JM, Aubin F, Michel F. [Psychiatric complications of corticotherapy.]
Rev Prat. 1990;40:556-558.
92. Foster CS: Diagnosis and treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated
uveitis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2003;14:395-398.
93. Zimmerman TJ, Kooner K, Sharir M, Fechtner RD, eds. Textbook of Ocular
Pharmacology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997.
94. Shah SS, Lowder CY, Schmitt MA, et al. Low-dose methotrexate therapy for
ocular inflammatory disease. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:1419-1423.
95. Samson CM, Waheed N, Baltatzis S, et al.: Methotrexate therapy for chronic
noninfectious uveitis: analysis of a case series of 160 patients.
Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1134-1139.
96. Holz FG, Krastel H, Breitbart A, et al., Low-dose methotrexate treatment in
noninfectious uveitis resistant to corticosteroids. Ger J Ophthalmol. 1992;1:
97. Shah SS, Lowder CY, Schmitt MA, Wilke WS, Kosmorsky GS, Meisler DM.
Low-dose methotrexate therapy for ocular inflammatory disease.
Ophthalmology. 1992;99:1419-1423.
98. Dev S, McCallum RM, Jaffe GJ. Methotrexate treatment for sarcoid-associated
panuveitis. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:111-118.
99. Kremer JM, Alarcon GS, Lightfoot RW Jr, et al. Methotrexate for rheumatoid
arthritis. Suggested guidelines for monitoring liver toxicity. American College
of Rheumatology. Arthritis Rheum. 1994;37:316-328.
100. Berthelot JM, Maugars Y, Hamidou M, et al. Pancytopenia and severe cytopenia
induced by low-dose methotrexate. Eight case-reports and a review of
one hundred cases from the literature (with twenty-four deaths). Rev
Rheumatol Engl Ed. 1995;62:477-474.
101. Carroll GJ, Thomas R, Phatouros CC, et al. Incidence, prevalence and possible
risk factors for pneumonitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving
methotrexate. J Rheumatol. 1994;21:51-54.
102. Elion GB, Hitchings JH. Azathioprine. In: Handbook of Experimental
Pharmacology. New York: Springer; 1975:404-425.
103. Bacon PA, Salmon M. Modes of action of second-line agents. Scand J
Rheumatol Suppl. 1987;64:17-24.
104. Elion GB. Pharmacologic and physical agents. Immunosuppressive agents.
Transplant Proc. 1977;9:975-979.
105. Yazici H, Pazarli H, Barnes CG, et al. A controlled trial of azathioprine in
Behcet’s syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:281-285.
106. Hooper PL, Kaplan HJ. Triple agent immunosuppression in serpiginous
choroiditis. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:944-951.
107. Michel SS, Ekong A, Baltatzis S, et al. Multifocal choroiditis and panuveitis:
immunomodulatory therapy. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:378-383.
108. Gion N, Stavrou P, Foster CS. Immunomodulatory therapy for chronic tubulointerstitial
nephritis-associated uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:
109. Singh G, Fries JF, Williams CA, et al. Toxicity profiles of disease modifying
antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1991;18:188-194.
110. Min DI, Monaco AP. Complications associated with immunosuppressive therapy
and their management. Pharmacotherapy. 1991;11:119S-125S.
111. Whisnant JK, Pelkey J. Rheumatoid arthritis: treatment with azathioprine
(IMURAN (R)). Clinical side-effects and laboratory abnormalities. Ann Rheum
Dis. 1982;41(Suppl 1):44-47.
112. Vavvas D, Foster CS. Immunomodulatory medications in uveitis. Int
Ophthalmol Clin. 2004;44:187-203.
113. Alliison AC, Eugui EM. Purine metabolism and immunosuppressive effects of
mycophenolate mofetil. Int Opthalmol Clin. 2004;44:187-203.
114. Kilmartin DJ, Forrester JV, Dick AD. Rescue therapy with mycophenolate
mofetil in refractory uveitis. Lancet. 1998;352:35-36.
115. Larkin G, Lightman S. Mycophenolate mofetil. A useful immunosuppressive in
inflammatory eye disease. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:370-374.
116. Baltatzis S, Tufail F, Yu EN, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil as an immunomodulatory
agent in the treatment of chronic ocular inflammatory disorders.
Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1061-1065.
117. Lau CH, Comer M, Lightman S. Long-term efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil
in the control of severe intraocular inflammation. Clin Exp Ophthalmol.
118. Placebo-controlled study of mycophenolate mofetil combined with
cyclosporin and corticosteroids for prevention of acute rejection. European
Mycophenolate Mofetil Cooperative Study Group. Lancet. 1995;345:1321-
119. Blinded, randomized clinical trial of mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention
of acute rejection in cadaveric renal transplantation. The Tricontinental
Mycophenolate Mofetil Renal Transplantation Study Group. Transplantation.
120. Gerber DA, Bonham CA, Thomson AW. Immunosuppressive agents: recent
developments in molecular action and clinical application. Transplant Proc.
121. Vitale AT, Rodriguez A, Foster CS. Low-dose cyclosporin A therapy in treating
chronic, noninfectious uveitis. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:365-373.
122. De Vries J, Baarsma GS, Zaal MJ, et al. Cyclosporin in the treatment of
severe chronic idiopathic uveitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1990;74:344-349.
123. Nussenblatt RB, Palestine AG, Chan CC, et al. Randomized, double-masked
study of cyclosporine compared to prednisolone in the treatment of endogenous
uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;112:138-146.
124. Nussenblatt RB, de Smet MD, Rubin B, et al. A masked, randomized, doseresponse
study between cyclosporine A and G in the treatment of sightthreatening
uveitis of noninfectious origin. Am J Ophthalmol.
125. Palestine AG, Austin HA III, Balow JE, et al. Renal histopathologic alterations
in patients treated with cyclosporine for uveitis. N Engl J Med.
126. Liu J, Farmer J, Lane W, Friedman J, Weissman I, Schreiber S. Calcineurin is
a common target of cyclophilin-cyclosporin A and FKBP-FK506 complexes.
Cell. 1991;66:807-815.
127. Mochizuki M, Masuda K, Sakane T, et al. A clinical trial of FK506 in refractory
uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:763-769.
128. Ishioka M, Ohno S, Nakamura S, et al. FK506 treatment of noninfectious
uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;118:723-729.
129. Kilmartin DJ, Forrester JV, Dick AD. Tacrolimus (FK506) in failed cyclosporin A therapy
in endogenous posterior uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 1998;6:101-109.
130. Sloper CM, Powell RJ, Dua HS. Tacrolimus (FK506) in the treatment of posterior
uveitis refractory to cyclosporine. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:723-728.
131. Fauci AS, Wolff SM, Johnson JS. Effect of cyclophosphamide upon the
immune response in Wegener’s granulomatosis. N Engl J Med.
132. Foster CS. Cicatricial pemphigoid. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1986;84:527-
133. Ozyazgan Y, Yurdakul S, Yazici H,et al. Low dose cyclosporin A versus pulsed
cyclophosphamide in Behçet’s syndrome: a single masked trial. Br J
Ophthalmol. 1992;76:241-243.
134. Rosenbaum JT, Treatment of severe refractory uveitis with intravenous
cyclophosphamide. J Rheumatol. 1994;21:123-125.
135. Jabs DA, Rosenbaum JT, Foster CS, et al. Guidelines for the use of immunosuppressive
drugs in patients with ocular inflammatory disorders: recommendations
of an expert panel. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:492-513.
136. Chabner BA, Allegra CA, Curt GA, et al. Antineoplastic Agents. In: Hardman
JG, Limbird LE, eds. Goodman and Gilman’s The Pharmacologic Basis of
Therapeutics. 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1995:1233-1240.
137. Tessler HH, Jennings T. High-dose short-term chlorambucil for intractable
sympathetic ophthalmia and Behçet’s disease. Br J Ophthalmol. 1990;74:
138. Akpek EK, Jabs DA, Tessler HH, et al. Successful treatment of serpiginous
choroiditis with alkylating agents. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1506-1513.
139. Miserocchi E, Baltatzsis S, Ekong A, et al. Efficacy and safety of chlorambucil
in intractable noninfectious uveitis: the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
experience. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:137-142.
140. Goldstein DA, Fontanilla FA, Kaul S, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients
treated with short-term high-dose chlorambucil for sight-threatening ocular
inflammation. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:370-377.
141. Mudun BA, Ergen A, Ipcioglu SU, et al. Short-term chlorambucil for refractory
uveitis in Behcet’s disease. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2001;9:219-229.
142. Yang CS, Liu JH. Chlorambucil therapy in sympathetic ophthalmia. Am J
Ophthalmol. 1995;119:482-488.
143. Palmer RG, Kanski JJ, Ansell BM. Chlorambucil in the treatment of intractable
uveitis associated with juvenile chronic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1985;12:967-970.
144. Cannon GW, Jackson CG, Samuelson CO Jr, et al. Chlorambucil therapy in
rheumatoid arthritis: clinical experience in 28 patients and literature review.
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1985;15:106-118.
145. Tabbara KF. Chlorambucil in Behçet’s disease. Ophthalmology. 1983;90:
146. LeHoang P, Cassoux N, George F, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) for
the treatment of birdshot retinochoroidopathy. Ocul Immunol Inflamm.
147. Rosenbaum JT, George RK, Gordon C. The treatment of refractory uveitis with
intravenous immunoglobulin. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127:545-549.
148. Seider N, Beiran I, Scharf J, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for
resistant ocular Behçet’s disease. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:1287-1288.
149. Kawashima H. Chemokines: their role in immunotherapy for intraocular
inflammation. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2003,11:83-90.
150. Joseph A, Raj D, Dua HS, et al. Infliximab in the treatment of refractory posterior
uveitis. Ophthalmology. 2003,110:1449-1453.
151. Munoz-Fernandez S, Hidalgo V, Fernandez-Melon J, et al. Effect of infliximab
on sight-threatening panuveitis in Behcet’s disease. Lancet. 2001;358:1644.
152. El-Shabrawi Y, Hermann J. Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy with
infliximab as an alternative to corticosteroids in the treatment of human
leukocyte antigen B27-associated acute anterior uveitis. Ophthalmology.
153. Mansour AM. Infliximab treatment of posterior uveitis. Ophthalmology.
154. Markomichelakis NN, Theodossiadis PG, Pantelia E, et al. Infliximab for
chronic cystoid macular edema associated with uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol.
155. Vazquez LB, Flynn T, Lehman TJA. Adalimumab therapy for childhood
uveitieis. J Pediatr. 2006;149:572-575.
156. Mansour AM. Adalimumab in the therapy of uveitis in childhood. Br J
Ophthalmol. 2007;91:274-276.
157. Smith JR, Levinson RD, Holland GN, et al. Differential efficacy of tumor
necrosis factor inhibition in the management of inflammatory eye disease
and associated rheumatic disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;45:252-257.
158. Smith JA, Thompson DJ, Whitcup SM, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled,
double-masked clinical trial of etanercept for the treatment of uveitis
associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;53:18-23.
159. Foster CS, Tufail F, Waheed NK, et al. Efficacy of etanercept in preventing
relapse of uveitis controlled by methotrexate. Arch Ophthalmol.
160. Nussenblatt RBF, Fortin E, Schiffman R, et al. Treatment of noninfectious
intermediate and posterior uveitis with the humanized anti-Tac mAb: a phase
I/II clinical trial. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:7462-7466.
161. Alpsoy E, Durusoy C, Yilmaz E, et al. Interferon alfa-2a in the treatment of
Behcet disease: a randomized placebo-controlled and double-blind study.
Arch Dermatol. 2002;138:467-471.
162. Kotter I, Zierhut M, Eckstein AK, et al. Human recombinant interferon alfa-2a
for the treatment of Behcet’s disease with sight threatening posterior or
panuveitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:423-431.
163. Kotter I, Vonthein R, Zierhut M, et al. Differential efficacy of human recombinant
interferon-alpha2a on ocular and extraocular manifestations of Behcet
disease: results of an open 4-center trial. Semin Arthritis Rheum.
164. Sakurai E, Matsuda Y, Ozeki H, Kunou N, Nakajima K, Ogura Y. Scleral plug of
biodegradable polymers containing ganciclovir for experimental
cytomegalovirus retinitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:2043-2048.
165. Okabe J, Kimura H, Kunou N, Okabe K, Kato A, Ogura Y. Biodegradable
intrascleral implant for sustained intraocular delivery of betamethasone phosphate.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:740-744.
166. Smith TJ, Pearson PA, Blandford DL, et al. Intravitreal sustained-release ganciclovir.
Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:255-258.
167. Sanborn GE, Anand R, Torti RE, et al. Sustained-release ganciclovir therapy
for treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis: use of an intravitreal device. Arch
Ophthalmol. 1992;110:188-195.
168. Anand R, Nightingale SD, Fish RH, et al. Control of cytomegalovirus retinitis
using sustained release of intraocular ganciclovir. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;
169. Jaffe GJ, McCallum RM, Branchaud B, Skalak C, Butuner Z, Ashton P. Longterm
follow-up results of a pilot trial of a fluocinolone acetonide implant to treat
posterior uveitis. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1192-1198.
170. Jaffe GJ, Martin D, Callanan D, Pearson PA, Levy B, Comstock T.
Fluocinolone acetonide implant (Retisert) for noninfectious posterior uveitis
Thirty-four-week results of a multicenter randomized clinical study.
Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1020-1027.
171. Lim JI, Wolitz RA, Dowling AH, Bloom HR, Irvine AR, Schwarz DM. Visual and
anatomic outcomes associated with posterior segment complications after
ganciclovir implant procedures in patients with AIDS and cytomegalovirus
retinitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127:288-293.
172. Algvere P, Alanko H, Dickhoff K, Lahde Y, Saari KM. Pars plana vitrectomy in
the management of intraocular inflammation. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh).
173. Belmont JB, Michelson JB. Vitrectomy in uveitis associated with ankylosing
spondylitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;94:300-304.
174. Ozdemir O, Erkam N, Bakkaloglu A. Results of pars plana vitrectomy in
Behcet’s disease. Ann Ophthalmol. 1988;20:35-38.
175. Dugel PU, Rao NA, Ozler S, Liggett PE, Smith RE. Pars plana vitrectomy for
intraocular inflammation-related cystoid macular edema unresponsive to corticosteroids.
A preliminary study. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:1535-1541.
176. Heiligenhaus A, Bornfeld N, Foerster MH, Wessing A. Long-term results of
pars plana vitrectomy in the management of complicated uveitis. Br J
Ophthalmol. 1994;78:549-554.
177. Bovey EH, Herbort CP. Vitrectomy in the management of uveitis. Ocul
Immunol Inflamm. 2000;8:285-291.
178. Verbraeken H. Therapeutic pars plana vitrectomy for chronic uveitis:a retrospective
study of the long-term results. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.
179. Yamaguchi M, Yasueda S, Isowaki A, et al. Formulation of an ophthalmic lipid
emulsion containing an anti-inflammatory steroidal drug, difluprednate. Int J
Pharm. 2005;301:121-128.