The Status of Vitreous Substitutes

Current and future

The Status of Vitreous Substitutes

Current and Future

While vitreous substitutes have been in use for almost a century, the advent of modern vitrectomy techniques pioneered by Machemer in the 1970s produced a tremendous increase in demand for intraoperative and long-term artificial vitreous replacements. Advances in vitreoretinal surgical techniques, instrumentation, and vitreous substitutes have improved anatomic and functional success rates greatly over the past few decades.

Vitreoretinal surgeons now have an array of agents available that are optimized for specific tasks. The three most common types of vitreous substitutes available in North America are intraocular gas, silicone oil, and perfluorocarbon liquid. In this article, the properties, indications, and complications associated with each group of vitreous substitutes are reviewed.


One of the earliest descriptions of vitreous substitutes dates to 1911 when Ohm treated retinal detachment with injection of sterile air into the vitreous cavity.1 However, it was Rosengren who established the concept of internal gas tamponade in 1938.2 Due to the high surface tension of the gas bubble, an effective seal of the retinal break can be established, allowing the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) to pump the subretinal fluid into the choroids and re-establish the natural retinal architecture.3 The buoyancy of the bubble helps to push the retina against the scleral wall while the surface tension prevents breakup of the bubble and entering of the subretinal space. For this tamponade to be effective with low-volume gas fills, such as those used during pneumatic retinopexy, the patient needs to be positioned so that the retinal break is located at the apex of the eye.

The role of intraocular gases broadened with expansile gases as investigated by Lincoff.4 The most commonly used gases are sulfur hexafluoride (SF6, Figure 1a) and perfluoropropane (C3F8, Figure 1b). These gases are colorless, odorless, heavier than air, and nontoxic to the human eye. During the life cycle of the intraocular gas bubble, three phases can be distinguished: expansion, equilibrium, and dissolution.5,6 The initial expansion is based on the net uptake of nitrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide, and water vapor from the surrounding vitreous into the bubble. In the equilibrium phase, loss of gas is balanced by continued uptake of nitrogen. During dissolution, a net exit of all gaseous components leads to a gradual disappearance of the bubble. These intraocular bubble dynamics depend on various factors, including initial gas concentration, initial gas volume, axial length, phakic status of the eye, and history of prior vitrectomy. But on average, a bubble of pure SF6 expands about 2 times within 24 to 48 hours with a duration of 1 to 2 weeks.5 A pure C3F8 bubble expands about 4 times within 72 to 96 hours and lasts 6 to 8 weeks until dissolution.6-8 The physical properties and bubble dynamics are summarized in Table 1.

Intraocular gases are used in clinical and operative settings. Pneumatic retinopexy is an option for repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment9 and involves injection of 0.4 to 0.6 mL of pure SF6. Intraocular gas may also be used in a procedure coined "pneumatic buckle" as an adjunct in a scleral buckle procedure to tamponade a break. After vitrectomy for retinal detachments, a nonexpansile long-term gas fill of C3F8 allows the formation of chorioretinal adhesions while minimizing the positioning requirements for the patient. For macular hole surgery with epiretinal membrane peel, SF6 is used for initial procedures and the longer acting C3F8 in repeat attempts of closure. For cases of tractional retinal tears in diabetic retinopathy and proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) repair, the longer-chained perfluorocarbon gases C2F6 or C3F8 are the common choices, unless the severity requires use of silicone oil.

When preparing the gas for injection, using a filter (0.22 μm, Millipore, Billerica, Mass) is recommended to sterilize the gas, although there have not been demonstrated reports of intraocular infection secondary to omitting this step. Flushing the syringe several times with the gas is recommended to avoid dilution of the desired concentration with residual air. The gas should not be left in the syringe for a prolonged period of time prior to injection, as diffusion will alter the effective gas concentration.10

The most common postoperative complication after fluid-gas exchange with expansile gases is elevation of the intraocular pressure (IOP), with up to 60% of patients experiencing a measurable pressure spike.11,12 Predisposing factors for IOP elevation include pre-existing glaucoma, anterior synechiae, and compromise of the outflow angle by pigment, hemorrhage, or neovascularization. Patients should be screened for these factors and the concentration, amount, and choice of gas should be modified accordingly. In the majority of eyes, temporary IOP control with antiglaucoma agents is sufficient. If the gas bubble expands to such a degree that the lens iris diaphragm is pushed forward, resulting in pupillary block and angle-closure glaucoma that is not controllable with medications, gas aspiration from the posterior compartment by pars plana approach may be indicated.13

Acute IOP increase can occur under special circumstances with overexpansion of the gas bubble. Nitrous oxide is a highly water-soluble inhalation agent that may be used during general anesthesia and will rapidly diffuse into an intraocular gas bubble. Patients with intraocular gas should be provided with an identification bracelet to alert medical personnel if subsequent anesthesia needs to be administered. During eye surgery nitrous oxide must be discontinued 20 minutes prior to intraocular gas injection to allow clearance of the nitrous oxide from the bloodstream and tissues.14

Air travel with intraocular gas is unsafe because the cabin pressure in airliners is reduced during flight. This leads to initial expansion of the intraocular gas bubble and subsequent increased trans-scleral pressure manifested as pain and decreased vision. Should a patient experience this situation the pilot needs to lower the plane to allow normalization of the cabin pressure. Experimental studies and clinical observations indicate that 0.6 to 1.0 mL of residual gas are safe for air travel.15-17

Prolonged contact of the intraocular gas with the lens can lead to gas-induced cataracts, presenting typically as feathery posterior subcapsular lens opacifications. These lens changes can be reversible if the patient is positioned to break the gas lens contact, but some of these patients will retain permanent lens changes.18

In aphakic eyes, contact of gas with the corneal endothelium can lead to decompensation and stromal edema by limiting diffusion of nutrients from the anterior chamber fluid to the corneal endothelial layer.19 To limit these anterior segment complications, patients with intraocular gas need to be reminded not to sleep in a supine position.


The use of silicone oil as a long-acting vitreous substitute was pioneered by Cibis20 in 1962 prior to development of pars plana vitrectomy. Due to the high level of contaminations in these early silicone oil preparations, the high complication rate resulted in near abandonment of this approach. Only after development of vitrectomy techniques and with availability of higher purification oils has this approach found widespread acceptance.21-23 To date a transatlantic gradient exists, with European vitreoretinal surgeons appearing to rely on silicone oil more than their North American colleagues. The most commonly used silicone oil preparations contain trimethylsiloxyl-terminated polydimethyl siloxane (Figure 2), but standards have yet to be established and batch variation may exist.

Silicone oil is transparent and has a refractive index of 1.404. This is slightly higher than that of vitreous gel and thus induces a mild hyperopic shift in phakic patients. However, in an aphakic eye, the steep anterior curvature of the silicone oil fill causes an increase in refractive power and lessens aphakic hyperopia.24 Compared to a gas fill that allows little useful vision until the meniscus clears the visual axis, a postsurgical eye with oil has a shortened visual rehabilitation time, which is important to consider in monocular patients.

At a specific gravity of 0.97, silicone oil is slightly lighter than water and a silicone globule will float on a residual aqueous base inside the eye. The resulting buoyant force is only one-thirtieth of that contained within a corresponding gas bubble.25 Because silicone oil is not miscible with the aqueous phase, the resulting interface develops surface tension, but at 20 to 40 mN/m this tension is one-half to one-third of a gas bubble's surface tension. In combination, these 2 forces are sufficient to postsurgically support the reattached, tension-free retina, but residual or recurrent radial traction, especially in the inferior half of the retina, can lead to re-detachment under oil.26 This is important to consider in cases of PVR, when pathology tends to be concentrated inferiorly or can recur in this location.27,28 Table 2 summarizes the physical properties of common silicone oils.

Due to its lower surface tension, silicone oil will slip through retinal tears more freely than intraocular gas and it may emulsify with the formation of miniature droplets of oil over time. While the molecular details leading to emulsification of the oil globule are not completely understood, it is apparent that low molecular weight contamination in the silicone oil plays a role.29 The two common silicone oils used in vitreoretinal surgery have viscosities of 1000 cS and 5000 cS, respectively. While the surface tensions of these oils do not differ significantly, the lower-viscosity 1000-cS oil tends to harbor a higher level of low molecular weight contaminants and therefore emulsifies more readily over time. With improved production and purification techniques this problem has decreased and residual time of silicone oil inside the eye without complications has been expanded.

Silicone oils are used when long-term need for stabilization of the retina with internal tamponade is anticipated. The Silicone Study Report, comparing the use of intraocular gas and silicone oil in surgical management of PVR, concluded that silicone oil was equivalent to C3F8 but superior to SF6.30-32 Subgroup analysis showed a benefit for oil use over gas in patients with anteriorly located PVR and patients without prior vitrectomy who received retinotomy during surgical repair. In management of severe diabetic tractional retinal detachment, silicone oil may have the added benefit of suppression of future neovascularization; however, prospective trials have not been performed. A small prospective trial of silicone oil in the management of traumatic endophthalmitis suggests a benefit possibly due to concentration of intravitreal antibiotic or through bactericidal properties of silicone oil.33 In cases of endophthalmitis refractive to initial intravitreal antibiotics, this approach should be considered. Other surgical indications for silicone oil include complicated retinal detachment, giant retinal breaks, hypotony due to chronic uveitis, infectious retinitis, and finally, retinal detachments where postoperative positioning would not be possible.

Postsurgical and late complications of intraocular silicone oil fills are common and may require removal of the oil earlier than the desired duration. Prolonged contact of silicone oil with the posterior capsule of the lens will inevitably induce cataract formation,34 likely due to prevention of nutrient diffusion rather than a direct toxic effect. Some surgeons may remove the crystalline lens during vitrectomy; however, retention of an intact posterior capsule is desirable to keep the oil confined to the posterior compartment. The increased use of silicone intraocular lenses (IOLs) during cataract extraction poses a challenge for use of intraocular silicone oil when a retinal detachment develops after cataract surgery. If the posterior capsule was violated during surgery or an yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) capsulotomy has been performed, silicone oil droplets may adhere to the posterior lens surface, necessitating lens removal.35 Thus use of a silicone IOL is not recommended in an eye that has any predisposing risk factors for retinal detachment.

Silicone oil migration into the anterior chamber may result in keratopathy or corneal endothelial decompensation. Interestingly, according to the Silicone Study Report, the rate of corneal complications is comparable to the
2-year complication rate in eyes that received a gas fill (26% vs 28%, respectively).36 If severe corneal decompensation occurs, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) chelation can be performed to reduce band keratopathy, or a corneal transplantation can be considered. If possible, the silicone oil should be removed at that time, as 68% of penetrating keratoplasties fail in oil-filled eyes.36

Increased IOP after silicone oil use in treatment of PVR occurs in up to 40% of patients.37,38 Emulsification of silicone oil can directly clog the trabecular mesh, or recruitment of macrophages and other inflammatory components can lead to open-angle glaucoma. If the silicone globule remains intact, pupillary block with angle closure can occur when the silicone oil occupies the pupillary sphincter and prevents aqueous fluid from passing into the anterior chamber. An inferior peripheral iridectomy is therefore routinely created in aphakic eyes prior to silicone oil fill. Spontaneous closure of the iridectomy may occur postsurgically in up to one-third of patients.39

While hypotony occurs in about one-fifth of silicone filled eyes within 3 years of surgery, this complication is significantly less frequent than in comparable gas-filled eyes.37 Hypotony can be managed with peeling of membranes of the ciliary body, subtenon steroid injection, or long-term retention of the oil to prevent phthisis.


In contrast to other vitreous substitutes, perfluorocarbon liquids have a specific density greater than water and are therefore unique in applying gravitational force onto the dependant portion of the retina.40 These liquids had been developed as blood substitutes based on their inert nature and ability to carry oxygen. In contrast to silicone oil, perflurocarbon liquids have low viscosity and can be easily injected and withdrawn through standard vitrectomy instruments. Perflurocarbon liquids are optically clear and do not absorb wavelengths of lasers used in retinal surgery, allowing application of endolaser during tamponade with perfluorocarbons. The commonly used agents are perfluoro-n-octane (C8F18), perfluorodecaline (C10F18), perfluoroperhydrophenanthrene (C14F24), and perfluorohexyloctane (C6F13C8H18).

In 1987, Chang41 reported on the use of perfluorocarbon liquids for repair of giant retinal tears, which previously required placing the patients into a prone position during surgery. Application of the heavier-than-water perflurocarbon liquids displaces subretinal fluid anteriorly, and the inverted flap of the retinal tear can be flattened with minimal manipulation. Because perfluorocarbon liquids are not used as long-term vitreous substitutes, exchange of the perfluorocarbon liquid with air and gas or directly with silicone oil is required. Bypassing the perfluorocarbon-air exchange and going directly to silicone oil has the advantage of reducing the risk of retinal slippage and the formation of folds.42 The use of perflurocarbon liquids in management of severe PVR has improved the anatomic success rate.43 Funnel detachments may on occasion be opened up, and epiretinal membranes and gliotic tractional bands can be visualized and dissected with progressive perflurocarbon injection and flattening. Posterior retinotomies may be avoided since subretinal fluid is forced anteriorly and allowed to escape through pre-existing breaks. Other indications for the use of perfluorocarbon liquids include repair of detachments secondary to ocular trauma, removal of dislocated crystalline lenses, and management and displacement of suprachoroidal hemorrhage.

Due to the low viscosity of these liquids, long-term intraocular tolerance is limited by dispersion into microdroplets over time, which leads to decrease in vitreous clarity, compromise of the trabecular meshwork with subsequent IOP rise, and subretinal migration of droplets through residual breaks. Perfluorocarbon liquids are therefore used primarily as a temporary intraoperative vitreous substitute and long-term complications are rare. In up to 10% of surgical cases, small amounts of retained perflurocarbon liquids were identified.44 While small amounts of residuals in the vitreous are usually well tolerated, subretinal migration of perfluorocarbon liquids can result in persistent focal retinal detachments with possible direct toxic effects to the photoreceptor layer.45 Perfluorocarbon liquid droplets found in the anterior chamber in aphakic patients should be removed by small-gauge needle aspiration to prevent possible corneal endothelium toxicity.

Perflurocarbon liquids represent the only class of heavier-than-water vitreous substitutes, but current agents cannot safely remain in the eye for an extended time. Research efforts are therefore focusing on long-term tamponading vitreous substitutes that can support the inferior retina. This would reduce the need for prolonged postsurgical face-down positioning and may increase the anatomic success rate in management of PVR by displacing proliferative cells from the inferior quadrants of the retina. Partially fluorinated alkanes, used either as pure liquids or in mixtures with silicone oil to create low viscosity oils with a density greater than water, have been tested in vitro46,47 and used in vitreoretinal surgery. Initial reports appeared encouraging, but long-term complications, including severe emulsification,48 intractable uveitis,49 and pathologic responses of the retina,50 have been reported recently. While this novel class of heavy tamponading agents holds promise, further investigational work is needed to address these complications. Based on the use of semifluorinated alkanes in rabbit eyes, the persistent gravitational force on the inferior retina alone does not appear to be deleterious.51


The intraocular vitreous body is a highly complex macromolecular structure, and despite significant progress over the past few decades, the ideal, universal vitreous substitute does not exist. The array of artificial substitutes available for short- and long-term replacements each have specific advantages and drawbacks. A thorough understanding of the properties, indications, and potential complications of intraocular gas, silicone oil, and perflurocarbon liquids is essential to utilize these adjuncts successfully during vitreoretinal surgery. RP


1. Ohm J. Über die Behandlung der Netzhautablösung durch operative Entleerung der subretinalen Flüssigkeit und Einspritzung von Luft in den Glaskörper. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1911;79:442-450.
2. Rosengren B. Results of treatment of detachment of the retina with diathermy and injection of air into the vitreous. Acta Ophthalmol. 1938;16:573-579.
3. de Juan E Jr, McCuen B, Tiedeman J. Intraocular tamponade and surface tension. Surv Ophthalmol. 1985;30:47-51.
4. Lincoff H, Mardirossian J, Lincoff A, et al. Intravitreal longevity of three perfluorocarbon gases. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98:1610-1611.
5. Abrams GW, Edelhauser HF, Aaberg TM, Hamilton LH. Dynamics of intravitreal sulfur hexafluoride gas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1974;13:863-868.
6. Lincoff A, Haft D, Liggett P, Reifer C. Intravitreal expansion of perfluorocarbon bubbles. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98:1646.
7. Peters MA, Abrams GW, Hamilton LH, et al. The nonexpansile, equilibrated concentration of perfluoropropane gas in the eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985;100:831-839.
8. Han DP, Abrams GW, Bennett SR, Williams DF. Perfluoropropane 12% versus 20%. Effect on intraocular pressure and gas tamponade after pars plana vitrectomy. Retina. 1993;13:302-306.
9. Hilton GF, Tornambe PE. Pneumatic retinopexy: an analysis of intraoperative and postoperative complications. The Retinal Detachment Study Group. Retina. 1991;11:285-94.
10. Humayun MS, Yeo JH, Koski WS, Michels RG. The rate of sulfur hexafluoride escape from a plastic syringe. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:853-854.
11. Abrams GW, Swanson DE, Sabates WI, Goldman AI. The results of sulfur hexafluoride gas in vitreous surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;94:165-171.
12. Lincoff H, Coleman J, Kreissig I, et al. The perfluorocarbon gases in the treatment of retinal detachment. Ophthalmology. 1983;90:546-51.
13. Chang S. Intraocular gases. In: Ryan SJ, Hinton DR, Schachat AP, Wilkinson P, eds. Retina. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier; 2005:2165-2178.
14. Stinson TW 3rd, Donlon JV Jr. Interaction of intraocular air and sulfur hexafluoride with nitrous oxide: a computer simulation. Anesthesiology. 1982;56:
15. Dieckert JP, O'Connor PS, Schacklett DE, et al. Air travel and intraocular gas. Ophthalmology. 1986;93:642-645.
16. Jackman SV, Thompson JT. Effects of hyperbaric exposure on eyes with intraocular gas bubbles. Retina. 1995;15:160-166.
17. Lincoff H, Weinberger D, Reppucci V, Lincoff A. Air travel with intraocular gas. I. The mechanisms for compensation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:902-906.
18. Chang S, Lincoff HA, Coleman DJ, et al. Perfluorocarbon gases in vitreous surgery. Ophthalmology. 1985;92:651-656.
19. Lee DA, Wilson MR, Yoshizumi MO, Hall M. The ocular effects of gases when injected into the anterior chamber of rabbit eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109: 571-575.
20. Cibis PA. Recent methods in the surgical treatment of retinal detachment: intravitreal procedures. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1965;85:111-127.
21. McCuen BW, Landers MB, Machemer R. The use of silicone oil following failed vitrectomy for retinal detachment with advanced proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1986;224:38-39.
22. Rinkoff JS, de Juan E Jr, McCuen BW 2nd. Silicone oil for retinal detachment with advanced proliferative vitreoretinopathy following failed vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;101:181-186.
23. Unosson K, Stenkula S, Tornqvist P, Weijdegard L. Liquid silicone in the treatment of retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1985;63:656-660.
24. Gallemore RP, McCuen BW 2nd. Silicone oil in vitreoretinal surgery. In: Ryan SJ, Hinton DR, Schachat AP, Wilkinson P, eds. Retina. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier; 2006:2211-2234.
25. Petersen J. The physical and surgical aspects of silicone oil in the vitreous cavity. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1987;225:452-6.
26. Glaser BM, de Bustros S, Michels RG. Postoperative retinal breaks occurring after intravitreal silicone oil injection. Retina. 1984;4:246-248.
27. DeCorral LR, Peyman GA. Pars plana vitrectomy and intravitreal silicone oil injection in eyes with rubeosis iridis. Can J Ophthalmol. 1986;21:10-12.
28. Machemer R. Massive periretinal proliferation: A logical approach to therapy. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1977;75:556-86.
29. Heidenkummer HP, Kampik A, Thierfelder S. Emulsification of silicone oils with specific physicochemical characteristics. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1991;229:88-94.
30. Trial RC. Vitrectomy with silicone oil or sulfur hexafluoride gas in eyes with severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy: results of a randomized clinical trial. Silicone Study Report 1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:770-779.
31. Trial RC. Vitrectomy with silicone oil or perfluoropropane gas in eyes with severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy: results of a randomized clinical trial. Silicone Study Report 2. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:780-792.
32. McCuen BW 2nd, Azen SP, Stern W, et al. Vitrectomy with silicone oil or perfluoropropane gas in eyes with severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Silicone Study Report 3. Retina. 1993;13:279-284.
33. Azad R, Ravi K, Talwar D, Kumar N. Pars plana vitrectomy with or without silicone oil endotamponade in post-traumatic endophthalmitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;241:478-483.
34. Federman JL, Schubert HD. Complications associated with the use of silicone oil in 150 eyes after retina-vitreous surgery. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:
35. Khawly JA, Lambert RJ, Jaffe GJ. Intraocular lens changes after short-and long-term exposure to intraocular silicone oil-An in vivo study. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1227-1233.
36. Abrams GW, Azen SP, Barr CC, et al. The incidence of corneal abnormalities in the Silicone Study. Silicone Study Report 7. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113: 764-769.
37. Barr CC, Lai MY, Lean JS, et al. Postoperative intraocular pressure abnormalities in the Silicone Study. Silicone Study Report 4. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:1629-1635.
38. Leaver PK, Grey RH, Garner A. Silicone oil injection in the treatment of massive preretinal retraction. II. Late complications in 93 eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 1979;63:361-367.
39. Madreperla SA, McCuen BW 2nd. Inferior peripheral iridectomy in patients receiving silicone oil. Rates of postoperative closure and effect on oil position. Retina. 1995;15:87-90.
40. Comaratta MR, Chang S. Perfluorocarbon liquids in the management of complicated retinal detachments. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1991;2:291-298.
41. Chang S. Low viscosity liquid fluorochemicals in vitreous surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1987;103:38-43.
42. Chang S, Kwun RC. Perfluorocarbon liquids in vitreous surgery. In: Ryan SJ, Hinton DR, Schachat AP, Wilkinson P, eds. Retina. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier; 2006:2179-2190.
43. Scott IU, Flynn HW, Murray TG, Feuer WJ. Outcomes of surgery for retinal detachment associated with proliferative vitreoretinopathy using perfluoro-n-octane: a multicenter study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:454-463.
44. Scott IU, Murray TG, Flynn HW, et al. Outcomes and complications associated with perfluoro-n-octane and perfluoroperhydrophenanthrene in complex retinal detachment repair. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:860-865.
45. Cohen SY, Dubois L, Elmaleh C. Retinal hole as a complication of long-standing subretinal perfluorocarbon liquid. Retina. 2006;26:843-844.
46. Hoerauf H, Kobuch K, Dresp J, Menz DH. Combined use of partially fluorinated alkanes, perfluorocarbon liquids and silicone oil: an experimental study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001;239:373-381.
47. Kim YK, Gunther B, Meinert H. A new, heavier-than-water silicone oil: a solution of perfluorohexyloctane in polydimethylsiloxane. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005;15:627-637.
48. Hoerauf H, Laqua H. Severe emulsification after combined use of a partially fluorinated alkane and silicone oil. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;240:131-136.
49. Theelen T, Tilanus MA, Klevering BJ. Intraocular inflammation following endotamponade with high-density silicone oil. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242:617-620.
50. Roider J, Hoerauf H, Kobuch K, Gabel VP. Clinical findings on the use of long-term heavy tamponades (semifluorinated alkanes and their oligomers) in complicated retinal detachment surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;240:965-971.
51. Mackiewicz J, Maaijwee K, Luke C, et al. Effect of gravity in long-term vitreous tamponade: in vivo investigation using perfluorocarbon liquids and semi-fluorinated alkanes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006; [Epub ahead of print].

Torsten W. Wiegand, MD, PhD, and Caroline R Baumal, MD, are both ophthalmologists at the Vitreoretinal Department of the New England Eye Center at the Tufts University School of Medicine in Boston. You can reach them at (617) 636-1486. Neither author has any financial interest in any of the products mentioned here.