intravitreal, VEGF Therapy, macula

CLASSIFIEDS

Find the job that’s right for you. PhysiciansJobsPlus allows you to post your resume, receive relevant ophthalmology open position alerts via email and apply for positions online.

Article Date: 11/1/2008

Print Friendly Page
Targeting Angiogenesis in Neovascular AMD

Targeting Angiogenesis in Neovascular AMD

DELIA N. SANG, MD, FACS · MARK S. HUGHES, MD, FACS

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a complex condition with a multifactorial pathogenesis that has yet to be completely characterized. The development of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) involves many interacting factors, including increased vascular permeability, proangiogenic signals, anomalous matrix alteration, remodeling, and inflammation.1,2 The introduction of anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies, such as ranibizumab (Lucentis, Genentech), was a revolutionary advance and has been shown to significantly improve visual acuity (VA) in many patients with CNV due to AMD.3,4 But the benefits of ranibizumab therapy are not necessarily uniform nor universal.3-5 Variability in outcomes among patients is probably related to the involvement of factors other than VEGF,6-9 as well as the effects of inflammation and stage of CNV. Combining ranibizumab with treatments that target different steps in angiogenesis might have the potential to enhance treatment outcomes.

In this article, we consider new agents directed against VEGF, as well as some of the steps within the angiogenic process that represent additional potential targets for new treatments for CNV due to AMD.

ANGIOGENESIS

Angiogenesis is the growth of new vessels (neovascularization) from pre-existing vessels, and it proceeds through several stages, beginning with the degeneration of basement membranes and ending with the development of differentiated vessels.10 Of the factors involved in angiogenesis, most attention has been given to VEGF, which stimulates endothelial cell mitogenesis, proliferation, vascular permeability, extracellular matrix degradation,11-15 and the formation of new vessels from existing choroid vasculature.16-18 The role of VEGF in angiogenesis was illustrated by the beneficial effects of ranibizumab, which binds to and inhibits all isoforms of VEGF. Also, many other modalities are under investigation for their potential to inhibit VEGF, including VEGF-Trap-Eye and small interfering RNA (siRNA) therapies.19 Other investigational strategies have focused on blocking the downstream effects of VEGF and targeting other factors involved in angiogenesis.

Delia N. Sang, MD, FACS, and Mark S. Hughes, MD, FACS, practice with Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston and are both adjunct clinical assistant scientists at the Schepens Eye Research Institute of Harvard Medical School in Boston. Neither author has any financial disclosures to make. Dr. Sang can be reached at Sangdn@aol.com.

NEW AGENTS DIRECTED AT VEGF

VEGF Trap-Eye

VEGF Trap-Eye is a recombinant protein consisting of the binding regions of VEGF receptors 1 and 2 and the constant region of human immunoglobulin G1.20 The binding of VEGF Trap-Eye to VEGF forms an inert stable complex, thereby blocking proangiogenic effects.20 In a phase 1 study of 25 patients with neovascular AMD, excess retinal thickness at day 71 was reduced by 63% with VEGF Trap-Eye at a dose of 1 mg/kg (the maximum tolerated dose) and 5.6% with placebo.21 Also, a dose-escalation study showed that single intravitreal injections of VEGF Trap-Eye at doses of 0.05 mg to 4 mg resulted in a mean increase of 4.8 letters of VA and a reduction in central retinal thickness from 298 μm to 208 μm.22 VEGF Trap-Eye has a long duration of action and maintains anti-VEGF activity for 10 to 12 weeks after a single injection.23 It may have the potential for less frequent dosing than with other anti-VEGF agents. Phase 3 trials of VEGF Trap-Eye are ongoing.

Small Interfering RNA (siRNA)

RNA interference has a catalytic mechanism that enables one siRNA molecule to facilitate the cleavage of thousands of mRNA molecules.24 Two siRNAs are under investigation as potential treatments for neovascular AMD, one targeting VEGF-A (bevasiranib; OPKO Health, Miami)24 and the other targeting VEGF receptor 1 (AGN211745 or SIRNA-027; Allergan, Irvine, CA).25

VEGF Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Vascular endothelial growth factor binds to 2 receptor tyrosine kinases, VEGF R1 and VEGF R2. Several tyrosine kinase inhibitors may provide a means to target these receptors, including vatalanib (previously known as PTK787). Vatalanib blocks the phosphorylation of VEGF and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptors and has been shown to prevent retinal neovascularization induced by ischemia in mice.26 Vatalanib is currently under investigation in clinical trials for patients with CNV due to AMD.

Multikinase inhibitors, such as TG100572 (TargeGen, San Diego), are also under investigation for neovascular AMD. Delivery of TG100572 to the retina and choroid seems to be enhanced by administration in the form of a prodrug, TG100801.27 Topical use of TG100801 suppresses laser-induced CNV in mice and reduces fluorescein leakage and retinal thickening in a rat model of retinal vein occlusion.27 Other multikinase inhibitors under investigation include pazopanib (GW786034; GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia), which inhibits VEGF receptors 1, 2, and 3, PEDF receptors α and β, and c-kit.28

NEW AGENTS DIRECTED AT NON-VEGF TARGETS

Complement Cascade

Increasing evidence has implicated the complement system in the development of drusen29 and in the progression from non-neovascular to neovascular AMD. The development of CNV due to AMD has been associated with the presence of basal laminar and linear deposits consisting of extracellular matrix components and vitronectin and occurring alongside activation of the complement cascade and VEGF.30 Complement components C3a and C5a have been shown to upregulate expression of VEGF31 and have been seen in specimens from patients with AMD and in animal models of laser-induced CNV.32,33 Complement and associated immune complexes may both be implicated in damage to the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE).34

The complement factor H (CFH) gene has been implicated in AMD development.35 It is estimated that 43% to 50% of cases of AMD are associated with the expression of a single nucleotide substitution at position 402 in CFH, which increases the risk of AMD by 2.45- to 5.57-fold.36,37 A CFH polymorphism in which tyrosine is replaced with histidine at position 402 of CFH (the CFH Y402H polymorphism) is implicated as a key risk factor for neovascular AMD, CNV, and geographic atrophy,38,39 and it has also been associated with the presence of complement in choroidal capillaries and other vessels.40 Position 402 of CFH is in a region that binds heparin and C-reactive protein (CRP),40 which is important given that CRP haplotypes influence the expression of CFH.41 The CFH Y402H polymorphism may place individuals at risk of developing AMD if it occurs alongside factors that stimulate the complement cascade.41 CFH Y402H genotypes have also been shown to be associated with differences in the size of CNV lesions and in responses to treatment.42

The important role of complement in the pathogenesis of neovascular AMD has raised interesting possibilities for the development of new treatments. A number of agents are under investigation as potential complement inhibitors, including TA106 (a monoclonal antibody against complement 3; Taligen Therapeutics, Aurora, CO), POT-4 (a peptide that binds to complement 3; Potential Pharmaceuticals, Louisville, KY), and ARC1905 (an anti-complement 5 aptamer; Ophthotech, Princeton, NJ).

Inflammatory Cells

There is increasing evidence that immunologic events are important in the development and progression of AMD, with macrophages playing a key role.43 There is also evidence that the activation of monocytes may be a marker of increased risk of neovascular AMD.44 Several studies have revealed the presence of macrophages and similar cells in specimens taken from individuals with AMD, with the cells often localized in areas of RPE atrophy, Bruch's membrane damage, and CNV.9,45-47 Oxidized lipoproteins have been shown to occur within CNV, with macrophages expressing cell surface receptors for these lipoproteins.48 Experimental models have indicated that the macrophages occurring in association with CNV appear to be derived from bone marrow and are recruited from the blood.49 Migration of macrophages from the vasculature into adjacent ocular tissue may result from alterations or deficiencies in chemokines, especially CCL2 and its receptor CCR2.43

There is also evidence for the involvement of a wider variety of inflammatory cells in neovascular AMD pathogenesis, including lymphocytes, fibroblasts, and myofibroblasts.50These may be participants in a chronic local inflammatory response centered on degenerated RPE cells involved in drusen formation.29 VEGF upregulation was shown to precede macrophage infiltration in an animal model of CNV,51 although macrophages and RPE cells are also associated with subsequent additional increases in VEGF.

Targeting leucocytes or the adhesion molecules involved in their recruitment may provide potential for new treatments. For example, the blockade of vascular adhesion protein-1, an endothelial cell adhesion molecule involved in leucocyte recruitment, has been shown to reduce CNV size, fluorescein leakage, and macrophage accumulation while reducing the expression of inflammatory mediators such as tumor necrosis factor-α, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and intercellular adhesion molecule-1.52

Platelet-derived Growth Factor

Platelet-derived growth factor may also play a role in CNV and acts as a mitogen for pericytes, smooth muscles cells, fibroblasts, and other mesenchymal cells. Pericytes may be critical for the maintenance of established blood vessels and may be important in the maturation process in CNV.

There is evidence that, in newly formed vessels, there is a period during which endothelial cells depend on VEGF53 and are responsive to the withdrawal of PDGF.54 In contrast, established mature vessels may exhibit less dependence on VEGF and may be associated with resistance to anti-VEGF or with rapid recurrence of CNV due to AMD. These observations are consistent with evidence that blockade of both VEGF-A and PDGF was more effective at suppressing neovascularization in experimental models than the blockade of VEGF-A alone.55

PDGF has been shown to stimulate angiogenesis and pericyte recruitment.7,8 The loss of pericytes from retinal vessels may be associated with vascular abnormalities and instability, including the formation of microaneurysms and vascular permeability. Blocking PDGF appears to result in loss of pericytes and possibly regression of maturing neovascularization.54 Continued production of VEGF-A by pericytes under certain conditions may protect endothelial cells from the effects of VEGF-A blockade by anti-VEGF agents.56

Integrins

Integrins are cell adhesion molecules involved in the mediation of cell-cell, cell–extracellular matrix, and cell-pathogen interactions.57 Structurally, integrins consist of a heterodimer with 1 α and 1 β subunit. In vertebrates, 18 α subunits and 8 β subunits have been identified and are known to form 24 α/β pairs.57 Several integrins have been shown to stimulate endothelial cell migration and macrophage recruitment under specific conditions.58

There is growing evidence that β1 integrins are involved in angiogenesis, especially with regard to the maturation and organization of neovascularization. Integrin adhesion receptor activation appears to be important in angiogenesis in both the developing embryo and in disease, while in the central nervous system, β1 integrin expression has been shown to be involved throughout the angiogenic process up to the maturation of vessels.59

The blockade of integrins has been shown to inhibit endothelial cell proliferation and induce apoptosis,60 while several inhibitors of angiogenesis, such as endostatin, can mediate their effects by binding to integrins.61 Integrins have also been shown to play a role in VEGF-mediated cell adhesion and endothelial cell migration, which can be suppressed by blocking integrin α5β1 with antibodies.62

There has been interest in the role of integrins in neovascular AMD based on evidence that integrin receptors play important roles in tumor angiogenesis.10 Blockade of integrin α5β1, the most important of the fibronectin receptors, has been shown to result in the suppression of tube formation stimulated by VEGF and in the apoptosis of proliferating (but not quiescent) endothelial cells.60 An anti-α5β1 antibody inhibited VEGF-dependent and VEGF-independent angiogenesis in an experimental model, while anti-VEGF inhibited only VEGF-dependent angiogenesis.60 Further evidence of the potential anti-angiogenic effects of integrin inhibition was provided by a study of EMD478761, an α5β3/α5β5 integrin antagonist, in a chick chorioallantoic membrane assay and a rat model of laser-induced CNV.63 In this study, EMD478761 significantly reduced angiogenesis induced by administration of basic fibroblast growth factor and suppressed the CNV development.

Pigment epithelium-Derived Factor

Pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) is an antiangiogenic factor that counters the effects of VEGF.64 Therefore, administering PEDF could have the potential to exhibit antiangiogenic effects, although high doses appear to have the opposite effect and lead to increased neovascularization.65 It may also be possible to increase local production of PEDF by delivering the PEDF gene to the retina using an adenovector (AdPEDF).66

Other Potential Targets

A variety of other potential antiangiogenic treatments could merit further investigation in neovascular AMD, including microtubule inhibitors, nucleic acid therapies, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists, and rapamycin. Further investigation is needed to determine whether these agents have the potential to target angiogenesis and improve outcomes in neovascular AMD.

CONCLUSIONS

Vascular endothelial growth factor is central to the pathogenesis of CNV in AMD, and its inhibition by agents such as ranibizumab has provided important advances in therapy. However, it is important to note that AMD is a complex condition in which many factors play key roles at different stages and that AMD may not be treated optimally with a single agent. Growing awareness of the structural and inflammatory components of angiogenesis and of the numerous factors involved in the angiogenic process may lead to identification of new targets for novel treatments for CNV due to AMD. In particular, several agents have been developed to target complement, integrins, and PDGF and are under investigation in clinical trials in patients with AMD. If these agents are proven effective, they may provide the means to target multiple steps in the angiogenic process when used in combination with anti-VEGF therapy, thereby providing more complete inhibition of neovascularization than can be achieved with monotherapy. RP

REFERENCES

  1. Kent D, Sheridan C. Choroidal neovascularization: a wound healing perspective. Mol Vis. 2003;9:747-755.
  2. Zarbin MA. Current concepts in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:598-614.
  3. Brown DM, Kaiser PK, Michels M, Soubrane G, Heier JS, Kim RY et al. Ranibizumab versus verteporfin for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1432-1444.
  4. Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, et al. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1419-1431.
  5. Rosenfeld PJ, Rich RM, Lalwani GA. Ranibizumab: phase III clinical trial results. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2006;19:361-372.
  6. Gehrs KM, Anderson DH, Johnson LV, et al. Age-related macular degeneration–emerging pathogenetic and therapeutic concepts. Ann Med. 2006;38:450-471.
  7. Guo P, Hu B, Gu W, Xu L, Wang D, Huang HJ et al. Platelet-derived growth factor-B enhances glioma angiogenesis by stimulating vascular endothelial growth factor expression in tumor endothelia and by promoting pericyte recruitment. Am J Pathol. 2003;162:1083-1093.
  8. Hellstrom M, Gerhardt H, Kalen M, et al. Lack of pericytes leads to endothelial hyperplasia and abnormal vascular morphogenesis. J Cell Biol. 2001;153:543-553.
  9. Penfold PL, Madigan MC, Gillies MC, Provis JM. Immunological and aetiological aspects of macular degeneration. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2001;20:385-414.
  10. Mettouchi A, Meneguzzi G. Distinct roles of beta1 integrins during angiogenesis. Eur J Cell Biol. 2006;85:243-247.
  11. Alon T, Hemo I, Itin A, Pe'er J, Stone J, Keshet E. Vascular endothelial growth factor acts as a survival factor for newly formed retinal vessels and has implications for retinopathy of prematurity. Nat Med. 1995;1:1024-1028.
  12. Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature. 2000;407:249-257.
  13. Hiratsuka S, Nakamura K, Iwai S, et al. MMP9 induction by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 is involved in lung-specific metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2002;2:289-300.
  14. Lamoreaux WJ, Fitzgerald ME, Reiner A, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor increases release of gelatinase A and decreases release of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases by microvascular endothelial cells in vitro. Microvasc Res. 1998;55:29-42.
  15. Leung DW, Cachianes G, Kuang WJ, Goeddel DV, Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor is a secreted angiogenic mitogen. Science. 1989;246:1306-1309.
  16. Grunwald JE, Metelitsina TI, Dupont JC, et al. Reduced foveolar choroidal blood flow in eyes with increasing AMD severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1033-1038.
  17. Michels S, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Rosenfeld PJ. Promising new treatments for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2006;15:779-793.
  18. Pe'er J, Shweiki D, Itin A, Hemo I, Gnessin H, Keshet E. Hypoxia-induced expression of vascular endothelial growth factor by retinal cells is a common factor in neovascularizing ocular diseases. Lab Invest. 1995;72:638-645.
  19. Chappelow AV, Kaiser PK. Neovascular age-related macular degeneration: potential therapies. Drugs. 2008;68:1029-1036.
  20. Rudge JS, Holash J, Hylton D, et al. Inaugural Article: VEGF Trap complex formation measures production rates of VEGF, providing a biomarker for predicting efficacious angiogenic blockade. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:18363-18370.
  21. Nguyen QD, Shah SM, Hafiz G, et al. A phase I trial of an IV-administered vascular endothelial growth factor trap for treatment in patients with choroidal neovascularization due to age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1522.
  22. Results of a phase I, dose-escalation, safety, tolerability and bioactivity study of intravitreal VEGF trap in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: the CLEAR-IT study. Retina Society/Club Jules Gonin. 2006.
  23. Stewart MW, Rosenfeld PJ. Predicted biological activity of intravitreal VEGF Trap. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:667-8.
  24. Dejneka NS, Wan S, Bond OS, et al. Ocular biodistribution of bevasiranib following a single intravitreal injection to rabbit eyes. Mol Vis. 2008;14:997-1005.
  25. Shen J, Samul R, Silva RL, et al. Suppression of ocular neovascularization with siRNA targeting VEGF receptor 1. Gene Ther. 2006;13:225-234.
  26. Ozaki H, Seo MS, Ozaki K, et al. Blockade of vascular endothelial cell growth factor receptor signaling is sufficient to completely prevent retinal neovascularization. Am J Pathol. 2000;156:697-707.
  27. Doukas J, Mahesh S, Umeda N, et al. Topical administration of a multi-targeted kinase inhibitor suppresses choroidal neovascularization and retinal edema. J Cell Physiol. 2008;216:29-37.
  28. Sonpavde G, Hutson TE. Pazopanib: a novel multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Curr Oncol Rep. 2007;9(2):115-119.
  29. Anderson DH, Mullins RF, Hageman GS, Johnson LV. A role for local inflammation in the formation of drusen in the aging eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134:411-431.
  30. Lommatzsch A, Hermans P, Muller KD, Bornfeld N, Bird AC, Pauleikhoff D. Are low inflammatory reactions involved in exudative age-related macular degeneration? Morphological and immunhistochemical analysis of AMD associated with basal deposits. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246:803-810.
  31. Nozaki M, Raisler BJ, Sakurai E, et al. Drusen complement components C3a and C5a promote choroidal neovascularization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:2328-2333.
  32. Ambati J, Ambati BK, Yoo SH, et al. Age-related macular degeneration: etiology, pathogenesis, and therapeutic strategies. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003;48:257-293.
  33. Mullins RF, Russell SR, Anderson DH, Hageman GS. Drusen associated with aging and age-related macular degeneration contain proteins common to extracellular deposits associated with atherosclerosis, elastosis, amyloidosis, and dense deposit disease. FASEB J. 2000;14:835-846.
  34. Ambati J, Anand A, Fernandez S, et al. An animal model of age-related macular degeneration in senescent Ccl-2- or Ccr-2-deficient mice. Nat Med. 2003;9:1390-1397.
  35. Lommatzsch A, Hermans P, Weber B, Pauleikhoff D. Complement factor H variant Y402H and basal laminar deposits in exudative age-related macular degeneration. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245:1713-1716.
  36. Edwards AO, Ritter R, III, Abel KJ, Manning A, Panhuysen C, Farrer LA. Complement factor polymorphism and age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2005;308:421-424.
  37. Haines JL, Hauser MA, Schmidt S, et al. Complement factor H variant increases the risk of age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2005;308:419-421.
  38. Wegscheider BJ, Weger M, Renner W, et al. Association of complement factor H Y402H gene polymorphism with different subtypes of exudative age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:738-742.
  39. Sepp T, Khan JC, Thurlby DA, et al. Complement factor H variant Y402H is a major risk determinant for geographic atrophy and choroidal neovascularization in smokers and nonsmokers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:536-540.
  40. Klein RJ, Zeiss C, Chew EY, et al. Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2005;308:385-389.
  41. Despriet DD, Klaver CC, Witteman JC, et al. Complement factor H polymorphism, complement activators, and risk of age-related macular degeneration. JAMA. 2006;296:301-309.
  42. Brantley MA, Jr., Fang AM, King JM, et al. Association of complement factor H and LOC387715 genotypes with response of exudative age-related macular degeneration to intravitreal bevacizumab. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:2168-2173.
  43. Patel M, Chan CC. Immunopathological aspects of age-related macular degeneration. Semin Immunopathol. 2008;30:97-110.
  44. Cousins SW, Espinosa-Heidmann DG, Csaky KG. Monocyte activation in patients with age-related macular degeneration: a biomarker of risk for choroidal neovascularization? Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1013-1018.
  45. Dastgheib K, Green WR. Granulomatous reaction to Bruch's membrane in age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:813-818.
  46. Grossniklaus HE, Ling JX, Wallace TM, et al. Macrophage and retinal pigment epithelium expression of angiogenic cytokines in choroidal neovascularization. Mol Vis. 2002;8:119-126.
  47. Lopez PF, Grossniklaus HE, Lambert HM, et al. Pathologic features of surgically excised subretinal neovascular membranes in age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;112:647-656.
  48. Kamei M, Yoneda K, Kume N, et al. Scavenger receptors for oxidized lipoprotein in age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:1801-1807.
  49. Caicedo A, Espinosa-Heidmann DG, Pina Y, Hernandez EP, Cousins SW. Blood-derived macrophages infiltrate the retina and activate Muller glial cells under experimental choroidal neovascularization. Exp Eye Res. 2005;81:38-47.
  50. van der Schaft TL, Mooy CM, de Bruijn WC, de Jong PT. Early stages of age-related macular degeneration: an immunofluorescence and electron microscopy study. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993;77:657-661.
  51. Sakurai E, Anand A, Ambati BK, van RN, et al. Macrophage depletion inhibits experimental choroidal neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3578-3585.
  52. Noda K, She H, Nakazawa T, et al. Vascular adhesion protein-1 blockade suppresses choroidal neovascularization. FASEB J. 2008;22:2928-2935.
  53. Gee MS, Procopio WN, Makonnen S, Feldman MD, Yeilding NM, Lee WM. Tumor vessel development and maturation impose limits on the effectiveness of anti-vascular therapy. Am J Pathol. 2003;162:183-193.
  54. Benjamin LE, Hemo I, Keshet E. A plasticity window for blood vessel remodelling is defined by pericyte coverage of the preformed endothelial network and is regulated by PDGF-B and VEGF. Development. 1998;125:1591-1598.
  55. Jo N, Mailhos C, Ju M, Cheung E, et al. Inhibition of platelet-derived growth factor B signaling enhances the efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in multiple models of ocular neovascularization. Am J Pathol. 2006;168:2036-2053.
  56. Darland DC, Massingham LJ, Smith SR, Piek E, Saint-Geniez M, D'Amore PA. Pericyte production of cell-associated VEGF is differentiation-dependent and is associated with endothelial survival. Dev Biol. 2003;264:275-288.
  57. Luo BH, Carman CV, Springer TA. Structural basis of integrin regulation and signaling. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:619-647.
  58. Avraamides CJ, Garmy-Susini B, Varner JA. Integrins in angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:604-617.
  59. Milner R, Campbell IL. The integrin family of cell adhesion molecules has multiple functions within the CNS. J Neurosci Res. 2002;69:286-291.
  60. Ramakrishnan V, Bhaskar V, Law DA, et al. Preclinical evaluation of an anti-alpha5beta1 integrin antibody as a novel anti-angiogenic agent. J Exp Ther Oncol. 2006;5:273-286.
  61. Sudhakar A, Sugimoto H, Yang C, Lively J, Zeisberg M, Kalluri R. Human tumstatin and human endostatin exhibit distinct antiangiogenic activities mediated by alpha v beta 3 and alpha 5 beta 1 integrins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:4766-4771.
  62. Orecchia A, Lacal PM, Schietroma C, Morea V, Zambruno G, Failla CM. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 is deposited in the extracellular matrix by endothelial cells and is a ligand for the alpha 5 beta 1 integrin. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:3479-3489.
  63. Fu Y, Ponce ML, Thill M, Yuan P, Wang NS, Csaky KG. Angiogenesis inhibition and choroidal neovascularization suppression by sustained delivery of an integrin antagonist, EMD478761. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:5184-5190.
  64. Duh EJ, Yang HS, Suzuma I, et al. Pigment epithelium-derived factor suppresses ischemia-induced retinal neovascularization and VEGF-induced migration and growth. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:821-829.
  65. Apte RS, Barreiro RA, Duh E, Volpert O, Ferguson TA. Stimulation of neovascularization by the anti-angiogenic factor PEDF. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:4491-4497.
  66. Campochiaro PA, Nguyen QD, Shah SM, et al. Adenoviral vector-delivered pigment epithelium-derived factor for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: results of a phase I clinical trial. Hum Gene Ther. 2006;17:167-176.


Retinal Physician, Issue: November 2008

Table of Contents Archives



AWS-#2